From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org,
Alexey Brodkin <alexey.brodkin@synopsys.com>,
Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 03/16] devres: Align data[] to ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 11:35:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200513093536.GB830571@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200423204014.784944-4-lee.jones@linaro.org>
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 09:40:01PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> From: Alexey Brodkin <alexey.brodkin@synopsys.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit a66d972465d15b1d89281258805eb8b47d66bd36 ]
>
> Initially we bumped into problem with 32-bit aligned atomic64_t
> on ARC, see [1]. And then during quite lengthly discussion Peter Z.
> mentioned ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN which IMHO makes perfect sense.
> If allocation is done by plain kmalloc() obtained buffer will be
> ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN aligned and then why buffer obtained via
> devm_kmalloc() should have any other alignment?
>
> This way we at least get the same behavior for both types of
> allocation.
>
> [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-snps-arc/2018-July/004009.html
> [2] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-snps-arc/2018-July/004036.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
> Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.8+
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/base/devres.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/devres.c b/drivers/base/devres.c
> index 8fc654f0807bf..9763325a9c944 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/devres.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/devres.c
> @@ -24,8 +24,14 @@ struct devres_node {
>
> struct devres {
> struct devres_node node;
> - /* -- 3 pointers */
> - unsigned long long data[]; /* guarantee ull alignment */
> + /*
> + * Some archs want to perform DMA into kmalloc caches
> + * and need a guaranteed alignment larger than
> + * the alignment of a 64-bit integer.
> + * Thus we use ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN here and get exactly the same
> + * buffer alignment as if it was allocated by plain kmalloc().
> + */
> + u8 __aligned(ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN) data[];
> };
>
> struct devres_group {
> --
> 2.25.1
>
I don't want to apply this to older kernels as it could cause extra
memory usage for no good reason. I have no idea why a non ARC system
would want it :(
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-13 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-23 20:39 [PATCH 4.4 00/16] Backported fixes taken from Sony's Vendor tree Lee Jones
2020-04-23 20:39 ` [PATCH 4.4 01/16] drm/msm: stop abusing dma_map/unmap for cache Lee Jones
2020-04-23 20:40 ` [PATCH 4.4 02/16] gpiolib: Fix references to gpiod_[gs]et_*value_cansleep() variants Lee Jones
2020-05-13 9:34 ` Greg KH
2020-05-18 10:23 ` [PATCH 4.4 02/16 (v2)] " Lee Jones
2020-04-23 20:40 ` [PATCH 4.4 03/16] devres: Align data[] to ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN Lee Jones
2020-05-13 9:35 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2020-05-13 9:48 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-13 10:10 ` David Laight
2020-05-13 11:05 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-13 11:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-13 12:37 ` David Laight
2020-05-13 13:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-13 13:35 ` David Laight
2020-05-13 13:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-13 13:50 ` David Laight
2020-04-23 20:40 ` [PATCH 4.4 04/16] crypto: talitos - Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in talitos_edesc_alloc() Lee Jones
2020-05-13 9:36 ` Greg KH
2020-05-18 10:17 ` Lee Jones
2020-04-23 20:40 ` [PATCH 4.4 05/16] drm: NULL pointer dereference [null-pointer-deref] (CWE 476) problem Lee Jones
2020-05-13 9:36 ` Greg KH
2020-04-23 20:40 ` [PATCH 4.4 06/16] clk: Fix debugfs_create_*() usage Lee Jones
2020-05-13 9:37 ` Greg KH
2020-05-18 10:08 ` Lee Jones
2020-04-23 20:40 ` [PATCH 4.4 07/16] arm64: traps: Don't print stack or raw PC/LR values in backtraces Lee Jones
2020-04-23 20:40 ` [PATCH 4.4 08/16] serial/sunsu: add missing of_node_put() Lee Jones
2020-05-06 8:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-05-06 9:02 ` Lee Jones
2020-04-23 20:40 ` [PATCH 4.4 09/16] wil6210: increase firmware ready timeout Lee Jones
2020-04-23 20:40 ` [PATCH 4.4 10/16] wil6210: fix temperature debugfs Lee Jones
2020-04-23 20:40 ` [PATCH 4.4 11/16] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: remove broken hci version quirk Lee Jones
2020-04-23 20:40 ` [PATCH 4.4 12/16] wil6210: rate limit wil_rx_refill error Lee Jones
2020-04-23 20:40 ` [PATCH 4.4 13/16] rtc: pm8xxx: Fix issue in RTC write path Lee Jones
2020-04-23 20:40 ` [PATCH 4.4 14/16] soc: qcom: smem: Use le32_to_cpu for comparison Lee Jones
2020-04-23 20:40 ` [PATCH 4.4 15/16] of: fix missing kobject init for !SYSFS && OF_DYNAMIC config Lee Jones
2020-04-23 20:40 ` [PATCH 4.4 16/16] mm/vmalloc.c: move 'area->pages' after if statement Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200513093536.GB830571@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=abrodkin@synopsys.com \
--cc=alexey.brodkin@synopsys.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vgupta@synopsys.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).