From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D36C433E0 for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 12:14:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 891752072C for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 12:14:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1589890440; bh=bFycJ6timOxlOWfG9iyAet6O/y7aqP8pCPZJr3zjOrI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=P3J7oUJTj4ucVm51zZdOq5c212XCFQeY8ygJoOOvEwMjiFWwYf0SbyvPuvwZ0DYeC nH7SIK04h2krFfga3qAPyVm78q2PYgkqgAwCb722DWJMzviFCAlp7hAmVPRsjmYfhx 7M10hDf8YX6BjzXQjIs6wy8sSRlCYWKFhkYzj5sA= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727057AbgESMOA (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2020 08:14:00 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:37306 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726196AbgESMN7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2020 08:13:59 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB1F1207D8; Tue, 19 May 2020 12:13:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1589890438; bh=bFycJ6timOxlOWfG9iyAet6O/y7aqP8pCPZJr3zjOrI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=efAjeWdtgiJrlkwyWdQ+NhYP1SS9GNVSYKaB0Ce/lJXVoVJvbWtufzXW+b5JsrSe0 nY8VISeYYhtDsl/26Gxw6qR/8NeRmvScxOEvfrDMtTgmNIKbMGFxyQmUxgZZ+E0kFY FJUHjdVSfSG4+5ZLV5+LAuJHiLrUPkjC+13+bFN4= Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 14:13:56 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Pavel Machek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Stefano Brivio , Pablo Neira Ayuso , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 41/80] netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: Introduce and use nft_rbtree_interval_start() Message-ID: <20200519121356.GA354164@kroah.com> References: <20200518173450.097837707@linuxfoundation.org> <20200518173458.612903024@linuxfoundation.org> <20200519120625.GA8342@amd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200519120625.GA8342@amd> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 02:06:25PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > [ Upstream commit 6f7c9caf017be8ab0fe3b99509580d0793bf0833 ] > > > > Replace negations of nft_rbtree_interval_end() with a new helper, > > nft_rbtree_interval_start(), wherever this helps to visualise the > > problem at hand, that is, for all the occurrences except for the > > comparison against given flags in __nft_rbtree_get(). > > > > This gets especially useful in the next patch. > > This looks like cleanup in preparation for the next patch. Next patch > is there for some series, but not for 4.19.124. Should this be in > 4.19, then? What is the "next patch" in this situation? thanks, greg k-h