From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A5CCC433E1 for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 19:27:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B2B9208B8 for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 19:27:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1590521273; bh=o6xEWP3l3NxJIyh56Zls/j+EDwwS16Hn5+vt1XvPQsE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=BqnFnOchbz8pcg/i/VoJkuolrH0DekQu8LvTQSqP6GlAzC+8xFxGcj/dddqOoSO8i RGhP1fb+/+++rVQ3kxwvVA/dxZkiaxZWgoj6r9m/vnl63P5Ro7bVUInVns12K9RDQ1 A7PVg/e3E2hvJEd89CyuEYOTrp0+xI0OgSC9aTXw= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390825AbgEZT1s (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2020 15:27:48 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59308 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2391288AbgEZTDx (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2020 15:03:53 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4AE0D20849; Tue, 26 May 2020 19:03:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1590519832; bh=o6xEWP3l3NxJIyh56Zls/j+EDwwS16Hn5+vt1XvPQsE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=pX9EnXe0AU+26DftWl1+iXW0wmAZ8sUa65Z1WZe3SNkiKE8rL1QEMZz1g7uGJyaKK WpY1gemp1Hapetu8VqVNVZZtp8LukXxMrVijIIJVnfWHzdJ00F8zQW0jjxS519dCab u/TmhGE5XgN4oE6aj2CU3ks+H2K4NBPpfa+PsSG0= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell , Thomas Gleixner , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.19 34/81] ARM: futex: Address build warning Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 20:53:09 +0200 Message-Id: <20200526183931.170337844@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 In-Reply-To: <20200526183923.108515292@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20200526183923.108515292@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: Thomas Gleixner [ Upstream commit 8101b5a1531f3390b3a69fa7934c70a8fd6566ad ] Stephen reported the following build warning on a ARM multi_v7_defconfig build with GCC 9.2.1: kernel/futex.c: In function 'do_futex': kernel/futex.c:1676:17: warning: 'oldval' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] 1676 | return oldval == cmparg; | ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~ kernel/futex.c:1652:6: note: 'oldval' was declared here 1652 | int oldval, ret; | ^~~~~~ introduced by commit a08971e9488d ("futex: arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser() calling conventions change"). While that change should not make any difference it confuses GCC which fails to work out that oldval is not referenced when the return value is not zero. GCC fails to properly analyze arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser(). It's not the early return, the issue is with the assembly macros. GCC fails to detect that those either set 'ret' to 0 and set oldval or set 'ret' to -EFAULT which makes oldval uninteresting. The store to the callsite supplied oldval pointer is conditional on ret == 0. The straight forward way to solve this is to make the store unconditional. Aside of addressing the build warning this makes sense anyway because it removes the conditional from the fastpath. In the error case the stored value is uninteresting and the extra store does not matter at all. Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87pncao2ph.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- arch/arm/include/asm/futex.h | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/futex.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/futex.h index ffebe7b7a5b7..91ca80035fc4 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/futex.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/futex.h @@ -163,8 +163,13 @@ arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser(int op, int oparg, int *oval, u32 __user *uaddr) preempt_enable(); #endif - if (!ret) - *oval = oldval; + /* + * Store unconditionally. If ret != 0 the extra store is the least + * of the worries but GCC cannot figure out that __futex_atomic_op() + * is either setting ret to -EFAULT or storing the old value in + * oldval which results in a uninitialized warning at the call site. + */ + *oval = oldval; return ret; } -- 2.25.1