From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA369C433DF for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 17:21:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793762074B for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 17:21:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591032099; bh=CJlRt5rX0756QP4W9I6gjOiHoKWUKI4ZMwWMpisdbpw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=A2hBWeIQ+uNv7dYpZuh88/2hMc9ravB6idL1huPJJzHSmLfumXddV8Pxl5jiCv6/X uanqR6t0LDGmFa3hSCLF/Rs0cTZrsluDaxD7rHhTp0dFjcx8pwDC/l/+Nim/4THrfo 1UydOK+sMLJSB3qyyQuxET2dlnwqg47272b1wm+Q= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726073AbgFARVj (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jun 2020 13:21:39 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:53586 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726017AbgFARVi (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jun 2020 13:21:38 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C57F3206A4; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 17:21:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591032097; bh=CJlRt5rX0756QP4W9I6gjOiHoKWUKI4ZMwWMpisdbpw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=SAc1iV/gljyi7dYwp+Xn2BuBB1byEw9vfquMStEZLyVNAaeVdVYn++bzPw36/EzYQ 7OG9OFYjGOL234gijufITFZqqW4TJtgzvcuTRjh6nX2EllGGB0oqQRAo0d3ovcRt6C bwphCdXRKLyDlUcB4kTxm9zY1URdddb8+cqhFnUM= Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 19:21:35 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin Cc: Naresh Kamboju , Sasha Levin , linux- stable , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org Subject: Re: stable-rc 4.9: arm: arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S:158: Error: bad instruction `ldcleq p11,cr0,[r10],#32*4' Message-ID: <20200601172135.GA1236358@kroah.com> References: <20200601170248.GA1105493@kroah.com> <20200601170751.GO1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200601170751.GO1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 06:07:51PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 07:02:48PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 09:18:34PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > > stable-rc 4.9 arm architecture build failed due to > > > following errors, > > > > > > # make -sk KBUILD_BUILD_USER=TuxBuild -C/linux -j16 ARCH=arm > > > CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- HOSTCC=gcc CC="sccache > > > arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc" O=build zImage > > > # > > > ../arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S: Assembler messages: > > > ../arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S:158: Error: bad instruction `ldcleq p11,cr0,[r10],#32*4' > > > ../arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S:233: Error: bad instruction `stcleq p11,cr0,[r0],#32*4' > > > make[2]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:404: arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.o] Error 1 > > > make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors. > > > make[1]: *** [/linux/Makefile:1040: arch/arm/vfp] Error 2 > > > ../arch/arm/lib/changebit.S: Assembler messages: > > > ../arch/arm/lib/changebit.S:15: Error: bad instruction `strbne r1,[ip]' > > It looks like Naresh's toolchain doesn't like the new format > instructions. Which toolchain (and versions of the individual > tools) are you (Naresh) using? > > > Odd, I'll drop it from 4.9, but it's also in the 4.14 and 4.19 queues as > > well, is it causing issues there too? > > What if it turns out that Naresh is using an ancient toolchain > that isn't supported by these kernels? Does that still count as > a reason to drop the patch? Depends on if anyone actually wants to use the newer toolchain on the really-old 4.9 release :) thanks, greg k-h