From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB453C433E0 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 16:33:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B692077D for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 16:33:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591115639; bh=4CjCw80BZTOzb/YKDNCLPm89dR/P4rKyDc/s6NraB/c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=e1LGMRCpFAgSW2nQ8mLdziCGbkllxor8mEAzKn41+piwA4mRo7y/Gw3p72o5D5yux OpOgcLrU71HFIMi1H92NqF8AfKLTytOXvRIylIdxEcK7KmSzaHp7M799pWJOX6mdBT /LaLZOUetGvqvTTTjoD0V3ri2ElCkYdFjvgo7R9o= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726598AbgFBQd7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2020 12:33:59 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60938 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726112AbgFBQd6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2020 12:33:58 -0400 Received: from localhost (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2B4520738; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 16:33:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591115638; bh=4CjCw80BZTOzb/YKDNCLPm89dR/P4rKyDc/s6NraB/c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Ko2gTmOzTzIq16CanYF+spsIJTdi34469Yf/sIueI6uV4n+pm5ROy4TVwqlUTUQcl nGjVcOeoLs56PVQpLxv1DQmBPG6MyCs3onXRFyEUGBgOjJs3fHVHuFO2qvQPS3ffvU w91hewpyPhXq94L+UvzFwPF2frRlPM0hHsxKDetI= Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 12:33:46 -0400 From: Sasha Levin To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/59] 4.9.226-rc2 review Message-ID: <20200602163346.GQ1407771@sasha-vm> References: <20200602101841.662517961@linuxfoundation.org> <3c900c0e-b15c-da05-d3d8-e68acf660076@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3c900c0e-b15c-da05-d3d8-e68acf660076@roeck-us.net> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 08:37:26AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >On 6/2/20 3:23 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.226 release. >> There are 59 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >> let me know. >> >> Responses should be made by Thu, 04 Jun 2020 10:16:52 +0000. >> Anything received after that time might be too late. >> > >Many arm builds still fail as attached. Is it really only me seeing this problem ? > >FWIW, if we need/want to use unified assembler in v4.9.y, shouldn't all unified >assembler patches be applied ? We don't - I took 71f8af111010 as a dependency rather than on its own merit. >$ git log --oneline v4.9..c001899a5d6 arch/arm | grep unified >c001899a5d6c ARM: 8843/1: use unified assembler in headers >a216376add73 ARM: 8841/1: use unified assembler in macros >eb7ff9023e4f ARM: 8829/1: spinlock: use unified assembler language syntax >32fdb046ac43 ARM: 8828/1: uaccess: use unified assembler language syntax >1293c2b5d790 ARM: dts: berlin2q: add "cache-unified" to l2 node >75fea300d73a ARM: 8723/2: always assume the "unified" syntax for assembly code > >I am quite concerned especially about missing commit 75fea300d73a, >which removes the ARM_ASM_UNIFIED configuration option. That means it is >still present in v4.9.y, but the failing builds don't enable it. Given that, >the build failures don't seem to be surprising. I'm just going to drop this series from 4.9 for now, until we can figure out how to do it right. -- Thanks, Sasha