From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65193C433E0 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 17:59:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB8021473 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 17:59:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1593712749; bh=eh4Fp0bh8AxElOsxWgAEVayHYjgJPhAdvGEgznM/jQM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=UpMac+hpQPnRw8TABFhLffwIfNF1DZPJftWs4UBASntCbR2Uvkz9gihlCCBZLBXGQ tI65chs2fIy60vy9f53ccLvRcdz8KjDMVIPpszITscm+mItmgPNVdZuFaaJsiLiLFu Xff5r6wMOuAFo3hSqpBVMJwfRcfmK2rsGiUrlmGQ= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727926AbgGBR7I (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2020 13:59:08 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:52102 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726349AbgGBR7H (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2020 13:59:07 -0400 Received: from localhost (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9DC7920760; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 17:59:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1593712746; bh=eh4Fp0bh8AxElOsxWgAEVayHYjgJPhAdvGEgznM/jQM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=oibj5Vb8A14kzOrGT3E3inN3tkufdcIuF8MapJZZk8MNinChxXtYBSFRtyM3E1qIX 1E6C3wwS+33N5vDXQBsq4CQYWxHa2eVtw5epVirvQIhMxM+v6/Le9mURckACfR5Kal Tvouw/7ZXbNlQfnt9UQzM20WGhCogDVpKMvjnfnk= Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 13:59:05 -0400 From: Sasha Levin To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: stylon.wang@amd.com, Nicholas.Kazlauskas@amd.com, Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com, alexander.deucher@amd.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/amd/display: Fix ineffective setting of max bpc property" failed to apply to 5.7-stable tree Message-ID: <20200702175905.GE2722994@sasha-vm> References: <159343042310143@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <159343042310143@kroah.com> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 01:33:43PM +0200, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > >The patch below does not apply to the 5.7-stable tree. >If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm >tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit >id to . > >thanks, > >greg k-h > >------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ > >>From fa7041d9d2fc7401cece43f305eb5b87b7017fc4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Stylon Wang >Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 19:04:18 +0800 >Subject: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Fix ineffective setting of max bpc property > >[Why] >Regression was introduced where setting max bpc property has no effect >on the atomic check and final commit. It has the same effect as max bpc >being stuck at 8. > >[How] >Correctly propagate max bpc with the new connector state. > >Signed-off-by: Stylon Wang >Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas >Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira >Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher >Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org I've grabbed this patch as a dependency and queued both for 5.7: cbd14ae7ea93 ("drm/amd/display: Fix incorrectly pruned modes with deep color"). -- Thanks, Sasha