* [PATCH 1/3] fuse: use ->reconfigure() instead of ->remount_fs()
@ 2020-07-10 11:58 Miklos Szeredi
2020-07-10 11:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] fuse: ignore 'data' argument of mount(..., MS_REMOUNT) Miklos Szeredi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Miklos Szeredi @ 2020-07-10 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-fsdevel; +Cc: Stefan Priebe, David Howells, stable
s_op->remount_fs() is only called from legacy_reconfigure(), which is not
used after being converted to the new API.
Convert to using ->reconfigure(). This restores the previous behavior of
syncing the filesystem and rejecting MS_MANDLOCK on remount.
Fixes: c30da2e981a7 ("fuse: convert to use the new mount API")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
---
fs/fuse/inode.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c
index 5b4aebf5821f..be39dff57c28 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/inode.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c
@@ -121,10 +121,12 @@ static void fuse_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
}
}
-static int fuse_remount_fs(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
+static int fuse_reconfigure(struct fs_context *fc)
{
+ struct super_block *sb = fc->root->d_sb;
+
sync_filesystem(sb);
- if (*flags & SB_MANDLOCK)
+ if (fc->sb_flags & SB_MANDLOCK)
return -EINVAL;
return 0;
@@ -817,7 +819,6 @@ static const struct super_operations fuse_super_operations = {
.evict_inode = fuse_evict_inode,
.write_inode = fuse_write_inode,
.drop_inode = generic_delete_inode,
- .remount_fs = fuse_remount_fs,
.put_super = fuse_put_super,
.umount_begin = fuse_umount_begin,
.statfs = fuse_statfs,
@@ -1296,6 +1297,7 @@ static int fuse_get_tree(struct fs_context *fc)
static const struct fs_context_operations fuse_context_ops = {
.free = fuse_free_fc,
.parse_param = fuse_parse_param,
+ .reconfigure = fuse_reconfigure,
.get_tree = fuse_get_tree,
};
--
2.21.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] fuse: ignore 'data' argument of mount(..., MS_REMOUNT)
2020-07-10 11:58 [PATCH 1/3] fuse: use ->reconfigure() instead of ->remount_fs() Miklos Szeredi
@ 2020-07-10 11:58 ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-07-16 0:27 ` Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Miklos Szeredi @ 2020-07-10 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-fsdevel; +Cc: Stefan Priebe, David Howells, stable
The command
mount -o remount -o unknownoption /mnt/fuse
succeeds on kernel versions prior to v5.4 and fails on kernel version at or
after. This is because fuse_parse_param() rejects any unrecognised options
in case of FS_CONTEXT_FOR_RECONFIGURE, just as for FS_CONTEXT_FOR_MOUNT.
This causes a regression in case the fuse filesystem is in fstab, since
remount sends all options found there to the kernel; even ones that are
meant for the initial mount and are consumed by the userspace fuse server.
Fix this by ignoring mount options, just as fuse_remount_fs() did prior to
the conversion to the new API.
Reported-by: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
Fixes: c30da2e981a7 ("fuse: convert to use the new mount API")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
---
fs/fuse/inode.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c
index be39dff57c28..ba201bf5ffad 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/inode.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c
@@ -477,6 +477,13 @@ static int fuse_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param)
struct fuse_fs_context *ctx = fc->fs_private;
int opt;
+ /*
+ * Ignore options coming from mount(MS_REMOUNT) for backward
+ * compatibility.
+ */
+ if (fc->purpose == FS_CONTEXT_FOR_RECONFIGURE)
+ return 0;
+
opt = fs_parse(fc, fuse_fs_parameters, param, &result);
if (opt < 0)
return opt;
--
2.21.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] fuse: ignore 'data' argument of mount(..., MS_REMOUNT)
2020-07-10 11:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] fuse: ignore 'data' argument of mount(..., MS_REMOUNT) Miklos Szeredi
@ 2020-07-16 0:27 ` Sasha Levin
2020-07-20 9:14 ` Miklos Szeredi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2020-07-16 0:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sasha Levin, Miklos Szeredi, linux-fsdevel; +Cc: Stefan Priebe, stable
Hi
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag
fixing commit: c30da2e981a7 ("fuse: convert to use the new mount API").
The bot has tested the following trees: v5.7.8, v5.4.51.
v5.7.8: Build OK!
v5.4.51: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
7f5d38141e309 ("new primitive: __fs_parse()")
82995cc6c5ae4 ("libceph, rbd, ceph: convert to use the new mount API")
d7167b149943e ("fs_parse: fold fs_parameter_desc/fs_parameter_spec")
NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.
How should we proceed with this patch?
--
Thanks
Sasha
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] fuse: ignore 'data' argument of mount(..., MS_REMOUNT)
2020-07-16 0:27 ` Sasha Levin
@ 2020-07-20 9:14 ` Miklos Szeredi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Miklos Szeredi @ 2020-07-20 9:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sasha Levin; +Cc: Miklos Szeredi, linux-fsdevel, Stefan Priebe, stable
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 764 bytes --]
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 2:27 AM Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> [This is an automated email]
>
> This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag
> fixing commit: c30da2e981a7 ("fuse: convert to use the new mount API").
>
> The bot has tested the following trees: v5.7.8, v5.4.51.
>
> v5.7.8: Build OK!
> v5.4.51: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> 7f5d38141e309 ("new primitive: __fs_parse()")
> 82995cc6c5ae4 ("libceph, rbd, ceph: convert to use the new mount API")
> d7167b149943e ("fs_parse: fold fs_parameter_desc/fs_parameter_spec")
>
>
> NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.
>
> How should we proceed with this patch?
Conflict resolution is trivial.
Thanks,
Miklos
[-- Attachment #2: merge.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 570 bytes --]
diff --cc fs/fuse/inode.c
index 16aec32f7f3d,ba201bf5ffad..000000000000
--- a/fs/fuse/inode.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c
@@@ -473,7 -477,14 +473,14 @@@ static int fuse_parse_param(struct fs_c
struct fuse_fs_context *ctx = fc->fs_private;
int opt;
+ /*
+ * Ignore options coming from mount(MS_REMOUNT) for backward
+ * compatibility.
+ */
+ if (fc->purpose == FS_CONTEXT_FOR_RECONFIGURE)
+ return 0;
+
- opt = fs_parse(fc, fuse_fs_parameters, param, &result);
+ opt = fs_parse(fc, &fuse_fs_parameters, param, &result);
if (opt < 0)
return opt;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-20 9:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-07-10 11:58 [PATCH 1/3] fuse: use ->reconfigure() instead of ->remount_fs() Miklos Szeredi
2020-07-10 11:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] fuse: ignore 'data' argument of mount(..., MS_REMOUNT) Miklos Szeredi
2020-07-16 0:27 ` Sasha Levin
2020-07-20 9:14 ` Miklos Szeredi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).