[PATCH v3 01/19] test_firmware: Test platform fw loading on non-EFI systems

[PATCH v3 01/19] test_firmware: Test platform fw loading on non-EFI systems

[Kees Cook]

On non-EFI systems, it wasn't possible to test the platform firmware
loader because it will have never set "checked_fw" during __init.
Instead, allow the test code to override this check. Additionally split
the declarations into a private header file so it there is greater
enforcement of the symbol visibility.

Fixes: 548193cba2a7 ("test_firmware: add support for firmware_request_platform")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
 drivers/firmware/efi/embedded-firmware.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
 drivers/firmware/efi/embedded-firmware.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/efi_embedded_fw.h          | 13 -------------
 lib/test_firmware.c                      |  5 +++++
 4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/efi/embedded-firmware.h

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/embedded-firmware.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/embedded-firmware.c
index a1b199de9006..0fb03cd0a5a2 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/embedded-firmware.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/embedded-firmware.c
@@ -14,11 +14,22 @@
 #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
 #include <crypto/sha.h>
 
+#include "embedded-firmware.h"
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_TEST_FIRMWARE
+# define EFI_EMBEDDED_FW_VISIBILITY
+#else
+# define EFI_EMBEDDED_FW_VISIBILITY static
+#endif
+
+EFI_EMBEDDED_FW_VISIBILITY LIST_HEAD(efi_embedded_fw_list);
+EFI_EMBEDDED_FW_VISIBILITY bool efi_embedded_fw_checked;
+
 /* Exported for use by lib/test_firmware.c only */
-LIST_HEAD(efi_embedded_fw_list);
+#ifdef CONFIG_TEST_FIRMWARE
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(efi_embedded_fw_list);
-
-static bool checked_for_fw;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(efi_embedded_fw_checked);
+#endif
 
 static const struct dmi_system_id * const embedded_fw_table[] = {
 #ifdef CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_DMI
@@ -119,14 +130,14 @@ void __init efi_check_for_embedded_firmwares(void)
 		}
 	}
 
-	checked_for_fw = true;
+	efi_embedded_fw_checked = true;
 }
 
 int efi_get_embedded_fw(const char *name, const u8 **data, size_t *size)
 {
 	struct efi_embedded_fw *iter, *fw = NULL;
 
-	if (!checked_for_fw) {
+	if (!efi_embedded_fw_checked) {
 		pr_warn("Warning %s called while we did not check for embedded fw\n",
 			__func__);
 		return -ENOENT;
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/embedded-firmware.h b/drivers/firmware/efi/embedded-firmware.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..34113316d068
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/embedded-firmware.h
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef _EFI_EMBEDDED_FW_INTERNAL_H_
+#define _EFI_EMBEDDED_FW_INTERNAL_H_
+
+/*
+ * This struct and efi_embedded_fw_list are private to the efi-embedded fw
+ * implementation they only in separate header for use by lib/test_firmware.c.
+ */
+struct efi_embedded_fw {
+	struct list_head list;
+	const char *name;
+	const u8 *data;
+	size_t length;
+};
+
+extern struct list_head efi_embedded_fw_list;
+extern bool efi_embedded_fw_checked;
+
+#endif /* _EFI_EMBEDDED_FW_INTERNAL_H_ */
diff --git a/include/linux/efi_embedded_fw.h b/include/linux/efi_embedded_fw.h
index 57eac5241303..4ad5db9f5312 100644
--- a/include/linux/efi_embedded_fw.h
+++ b/include/linux/efi_embedded_fw.h
@@ -7,19 +7,6 @@
 
 #define EFI_EMBEDDED_FW_PREFIX_LEN		8
 
-/*
- * This struct and efi_embedded_fw_list are private to the efi-embedded fw
- * implementation they are in this header for use by lib/test_firmware.c only!
- */
-struct efi_embedded_fw {
-	struct list_head list;
-	const char *name;
-	const u8 *data;
-	size_t length;
-};
-
-extern struct list_head efi_embedded_fw_list;
-
 /**
  * struct efi_embedded_fw_desc - This struct is used by the EFI embedded-fw
  *                               code to search for embedded firmwares.
diff --git a/lib/test_firmware.c b/lib/test_firmware.c
index 9fee2b93a8d1..62af792e151c 100644
--- a/lib/test_firmware.c
+++ b/lib/test_firmware.c
@@ -489,6 +489,7 @@ static ssize_t trigger_request_store(struct device *dev,
 static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(trigger_request);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_EFI_EMBEDDED_FIRMWARE
+#include "../drivers/firmware/efi/embedded-firmware.h"
 static ssize_t trigger_request_platform_store(struct device *dev,
 					      struct device_attribute *attr,
 					      const char *buf, size_t count)
@@ -501,6 +502,7 @@ static ssize_t trigger_request_platform_store(struct device *dev,
 	};
 	struct efi_embedded_fw efi_embedded_fw;
 	const struct firmware *firmware = NULL;
+	bool saved_efi_embedded_fw_checked;
 	char *name;
 	int rc;
 
@@ -513,6 +515,8 @@ static ssize_t trigger_request_platform_store(struct device *dev,
 	efi_embedded_fw.data = (void *)test_data;
 	efi_embedded_fw.length = sizeof(test_data);
 	list_add(&efi_embedded_fw.list, &efi_embedded_fw_list);
+	saved_efi_embedded_fw_checked = efi_embedded_fw_checked;
+	efi_embedded_fw_checked = true;
 
 	pr_info("loading '%s'\n", name);
 	rc = firmware_request_platform(&firmware, name, dev);
@@ -530,6 +534,7 @@ static ssize_t trigger_request_platform_store(struct device *dev,
 	rc = count;
 
 out:
+	efi_embedded_fw_checked = saved_efi_embedded_fw_checked;
 	release_firmware(firmware);
 	list_del(&efi_embedded_fw.list);
 	kfree(name);
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v3 03/19] firmware_loader: EFI firmware loader must handle pre-allocated buffer

[Kees Cook]

The EFI platform firmware fallback would clobber any pre-allocated
buffers. Instead, correctly refuse to reallocate when too small (as
already done in the sysfs fallback), or perform allocation normally
when needed.

Fixes: e4c2c0ff00ec ("firmware: Add new platform fallback mechanism and firm ware_request_platform()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
To aid in backporting, this change is made before moving
kernel_read_file() to separate header/source files.
---
 drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback_platform.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback_platform.c b/drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback_platform.c
index cdd2c9a9f38a..685edb7dd05a 100644
--- a/drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback_platform.c
+++ b/drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback_platform.c
@@ -25,7 +25,10 @@ int firmware_fallback_platform(struct fw_priv *fw_priv, u32 opt_flags)
 	if (rc)
 		return rc; /* rc == -ENOENT when the fw was not found */
 
-	fw_priv->data = vmalloc(size);
+	if (fw_priv->data && size > fw_priv->allocated_size)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (!fw_priv->data)
+		fw_priv->data = vmalloc(size);
 	if (!fw_priv->data)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v3 04/19] fs/kernel_read_file: Remove FIRMWARE_PREALLOC_BUFFER enum

[Kees Cook]

FIRMWARE_PREALLOC_BUFFER is a "how", not a "what", and confuses the LSMs
that are interested in filtering between types of things. The "how"
should be an internal detail made uninteresting to the LSMs.

Fixes: a098ecd2fa7d ("firmware: support loading into a pre-allocated buffer")
Fixes: fd90bc559bfb ("ima: based on policy verify firmware signatures (pre-allocated buffer)")
Fixes: 4f0496d8ffa3 ("ima: based on policy warn about loading firmware (pre-allocated buffer)")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
To aid in backporting, this change is made before moving
kernel_read_file() to separate header/source files.
---
 drivers/base/firmware_loader/main.c | 5 ++---
 fs/exec.c                           | 7 ++++---
 include/linux/fs.h                  | 2 +-
 kernel/module.c                     | 2 +-
 security/integrity/digsig.c         | 2 +-
 security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c     | 2 +-
 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c   | 6 ++----
 7 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_loader/main.c b/drivers/base/firmware_loader/main.c
index ca871b13524e..c2f57cedcd6f 100644
--- a/drivers/base/firmware_loader/main.c
+++ b/drivers/base/firmware_loader/main.c
@@ -465,14 +465,12 @@ fw_get_filesystem_firmware(struct device *device, struct fw_priv *fw_priv,
 	int i, len;
 	int rc = -ENOENT;
 	char *path;
-	enum kernel_read_file_id id = READING_FIRMWARE;
 	size_t msize = INT_MAX;
 	void *buffer = NULL;
 
 	/* Already populated data member means we're loading into a buffer */
 	if (!decompress && fw_priv->data) {
 		buffer = fw_priv->data;
-		id = READING_FIRMWARE_PREALLOC_BUFFER;
 		msize = fw_priv->allocated_size;
 	}
 
@@ -496,7 +494,8 @@ fw_get_filesystem_firmware(struct device *device, struct fw_priv *fw_priv,
 
 		/* load firmware files from the mount namespace of init */
 		rc = kernel_read_file_from_path_initns(path, &buffer,
-						       &size, msize, id);
+						       &size, msize,
+						       READING_FIRMWARE);
 		if (rc) {
 			if (rc != -ENOENT)
 				dev_warn(device, "loading %s failed with error %d\n",
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index e6e8a9a70327..2bf549757ce7 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -927,6 +927,7 @@ int kernel_read_file(struct file *file, void **buf, loff_t *size,
 {
 	loff_t i_size, pos;
 	ssize_t bytes = 0;
+	void *allocated = NULL;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (!S_ISREG(file_inode(file)->i_mode) || max_size < 0)
@@ -950,8 +951,8 @@ int kernel_read_file(struct file *file, void **buf, loff_t *size,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	if (id != READING_FIRMWARE_PREALLOC_BUFFER)
-		*buf = vmalloc(i_size);
+	if (!*buf)
+		*buf = allocated = vmalloc(i_size);
 	if (!*buf) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out;
@@ -980,7 +981,7 @@ int kernel_read_file(struct file *file, void **buf, loff_t *size,
 
 out_free:
 	if (ret < 0) {
-		if (id != READING_FIRMWARE_PREALLOC_BUFFER) {
+		if (allocated) {
 			vfree(*buf);
 			*buf = NULL;
 		}
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 3f881a892ea7..95fc775ed937 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -2993,10 +2993,10 @@ static inline void i_readcount_inc(struct inode *inode)
 #endif
 extern int do_pipe_flags(int *, int);
 
+/* This is a list of *what* is being read, not *how*. */
 #define __kernel_read_file_id(id) \
 	id(UNKNOWN, unknown)		\
 	id(FIRMWARE, firmware)		\
-	id(FIRMWARE_PREALLOC_BUFFER, firmware)	\
 	id(FIRMWARE_EFI_EMBEDDED, firmware)	\
 	id(MODULE, kernel-module)		\
 	id(KEXEC_IMAGE, kexec-image)		\
diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
index 0c6573b98c36..26105148f4d2 100644
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -3988,7 +3988,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(finit_module, int, fd, const char __user *, uargs, int, flags)
 {
 	struct load_info info = { };
 	loff_t size;
-	void *hdr;
+	void *hdr = NULL;
 	int err;
 
 	err = may_init_module();
diff --git a/security/integrity/digsig.c b/security/integrity/digsig.c
index e9cbadade74b..ac02b7632353 100644
--- a/security/integrity/digsig.c
+++ b/security/integrity/digsig.c
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ int __init integrity_add_key(const unsigned int id, const void *data,
 
 int __init integrity_load_x509(const unsigned int id, const char *path)
 {
-	void *data;
+	void *data = NULL;
 	loff_t size;
 	int rc;
 	key_perm_t perm;
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
index e3fcad871861..15a44c5022f7 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static const struct file_operations ima_ascii_measurements_ops = {
 
 static ssize_t ima_read_policy(char *path)
 {
-	void *data;
+	void *data = NULL;
 	char *datap;
 	loff_t size;
 	int rc, pathlen = strlen(path);
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
index c1583d98c5e5..f80ee4ce4669 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
@@ -611,19 +611,17 @@ void ima_post_path_mknod(struct dentry *dentry)
 int ima_read_file(struct file *file, enum kernel_read_file_id read_id)
 {
 	/*
-	 * READING_FIRMWARE_PREALLOC_BUFFER
-	 *
 	 * Do devices using pre-allocated memory run the risk of the
 	 * firmware being accessible to the device prior to the completion
 	 * of IMA's signature verification any more than when using two
-	 * buffers?
+	 * buffers? It may be desirable to include the buffer address
+	 * in this API and walk all the dma_map_single() mappings to check.
 	 */
 	return 0;
 }
 
 const int read_idmap[READING_MAX_ID] = {
 	[READING_FIRMWARE] = FIRMWARE_CHECK,
-	[READING_FIRMWARE_PREALLOC_BUFFER] = FIRMWARE_CHECK,
 	[READING_MODULE] = MODULE_CHECK,
 	[READING_KEXEC_IMAGE] = KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK,
 	[READING_KEXEC_INITRAMFS] = KEXEC_INITRAMFS_CHECK,
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v3 05/19] fs/kernel_read_file: Remove FIRMWARE_EFI_EMBEDDED enum

[Kees Cook]

The "FIRMWARE_EFI_EMBEDDED" enum is a "where", not a "what". It
should not be distinguished separately from just "FIRMWARE", as this
confuses the LSMs about what is being loaded. Additionally, there was
no actual validation of the firmware contents happening.

Fixes: e4c2c0ff00ec ("firmware: Add new platform fallback mechanism and firmware_request_platform()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
To aid in backporting, this change is made before moving
kernel_read_file() to separate header/source files.
---
 drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback_platform.c | 2 +-
 include/linux/fs.h                               | 3 +--
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback_platform.c b/drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback_platform.c
index 685edb7dd05a..6958ab1a8059 100644
--- a/drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback_platform.c
+++ b/drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback_platform.c
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ int firmware_fallback_platform(struct fw_priv *fw_priv, u32 opt_flags)
 	if (!(opt_flags & FW_OPT_FALLBACK_PLATFORM))
 		return -ENOENT;
 
-	rc = security_kernel_load_data(LOADING_FIRMWARE_EFI_EMBEDDED);
+	rc = security_kernel_load_data(LOADING_FIRMWARE);
 	if (rc)
 		return rc;
 
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 95fc775ed937..f50a35d54a61 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -2993,11 +2993,10 @@ static inline void i_readcount_inc(struct inode *inode)
 #endif
 extern int do_pipe_flags(int *, int);
 
-/* This is a list of *what* is being read, not *how*. */
+/* This is a list of *what* is being read, not *how* nor *where*. */
 #define __kernel_read_file_id(id) \
 	id(UNKNOWN, unknown)		\
 	id(FIRMWARE, firmware)		\
-	id(FIRMWARE_EFI_EMBEDDED, firmware)	\
 	id(MODULE, kernel-module)		\
 	id(KEXEC_IMAGE, kexec-image)		\
 	id(KEXEC_INITRAMFS, kexec-initramfs)	\
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH v3 03/19] firmware_loader: EFI firmware loader must handle pre-allocated buffer

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 02:36:24PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> The EFI platform firmware fallback would clobber any pre-allocated
> buffers. Instead, correctly refuse to reallocate when too small (as
> already done in the sysfs fallback), or perform allocation normally
> when needed.
> 
> Fixes: e4c2c0ff00ec ("firmware: Add new platform fallback mechanism and firm ware_request_platform()")

"firmware_request_platform()" :)

Re: [PATCH v3 03/19] firmware_loader: EFI firmware loader must handle pre-allocated buffer

[Kees Cook]

On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 12:07:00PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 02:36:24PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > The EFI platform firmware fallback would clobber any pre-allocated
> > buffers. Instead, correctly refuse to reallocate when too small (as
> > already done in the sysfs fallback), or perform allocation normally
> > when needed.
> > 
> > Fixes: e4c2c0ff00ec ("firmware: Add new platform fallback mechanism and firm ware_request_platform()")
> 
> "firmware_request_platform()" :)

Weird... I'm not sure where that mangling happened. Perhaps a bad
cut/paste at 80 columns? Hmpf; thanks for catching. I've updated it on
my end (I assume you fixed this manually, though?)

Thanks!

-- 
Kees Cook

Re: [PATCH v3 03/19] firmware_loader: EFI firmware loader must handle pre-allocated buffer

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 08:50:33AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 12:07:00PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 02:36:24PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > The EFI platform firmware fallback would clobber any pre-allocated
> > > buffers. Instead, correctly refuse to reallocate when too small (as
> > > already done in the sysfs fallback), or perform allocation normally
> > > when needed.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: e4c2c0ff00ec ("firmware: Add new platform fallback mechanism and firm ware_request_platform()")
> > 
> > "firmware_request_platform()" :)
> 
> Weird... I'm not sure where that mangling happened. Perhaps a bad
> cut/paste at 80 columns? Hmpf; thanks for catching. I've updated it on
> my end (I assume you fixed this manually, though?)

Yes, I fixed it up already, no worries.

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH v3 04/19] fs/kernel_read_file: Remove FIRMWARE_PREALLOC_BUFFER enum

[Mimi Zohar]

On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 14:36 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> FIRMWARE_PREALLOC_BUFFER is a "how", not a "what", and confuses the LSMs
> that are interested in filtering between types of things. The "how"
> should be an internal detail made uninteresting to the LSMs.
> 
> Fixes: a098ecd2fa7d ("firmware: support loading into a pre-allocated buffer")
> Fixes: fd90bc559bfb ("ima: based on policy verify firmware signatures (pre-allocated buffer)")
> Fixes: 4f0496d8ffa3 ("ima: based on policy warn about loading firmware (pre-allocated buffer)")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Acked-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@broadcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

Thank you for updating the pre-allocated buffer comment.

Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

Re: [PATCH v3 01/19] test_firmware: Test platform fw loading on non-EFI systems

[Sasha Levin]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1529 bytes --]

Hi

[This is an automated email]

This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag
fixing commit: 548193cba2a7 ("test_firmware: add support for firmware_request_platform").

The bot has tested the following trees: v5.7.10.

v5.7.10: Build failed! Errors:
    drivers/firmware/efi/embedded-firmware.c:25:38: error: static declaration of ‘efi_embedded_fw_list’ follows non-static declaration
    drivers/firmware/efi/embedded-firmware.c:26:33: error: static declaration of ‘efi_embedded_fw_checked’ follows non-static declaration
    drivers/firmware/efi/embedded-firmware.c:25:38: error: static declaration of ‘efi_embedded_fw_list’ follows non-static declaration
    drivers/firmware/efi/embedded-firmware.c:26:33: error: static declaration of ‘efi_embedded_fw_checked’ follows non-static declaration
    drivers/firmware/efi/embedded-firmware.c:25:38: error: static declaration of ‘efi_embedded_fw_list’ follows non-static declaration
    drivers/firmware/efi/embedded-firmware.c:26:33: error: static declaration of ‘efi_embedded_fw_checked’ follows non-static declaration
    drivers/firmware/efi/embedded-firmware.c:25:38: error: static declaration of ‘efi_embedded_fw_list’ follows non-static declaration
    drivers/firmware/efi/embedded-firmware.c:26:33: error: static declaration of ‘efi_embedded_fw_checked’ follows non-static declaration


NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.

How should we proceed with this patch?

-- 
Thanks
Sasha

Re: [PATCH v3 04/19] fs/kernel_read_file: Remove FIRMWARE_PREALLOC_BUFFER enum

[Sasha Levin]

Hi

[This is an automated email]

This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag
fixing commit: a098ecd2fa7d ("firmware: support loading into a pre-allocated buffer").

The bot has tested the following trees: v5.7.10, v5.4.53, v4.19.134, v4.14.189, v4.9.231.

v5.7.10: Build OK!
v5.4.53: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
    85db1cde8253 ("firmware: Rename FW_OPT_NOFALLBACK to FW_OPT_NOFALLBACK_SYSFS")
    901cff7cb961 ("firmware_loader: load files from the mount namespace of init")
    e4c2c0ff00ec ("firmware: Add new platform fallback mechanism and firmware_request_platform()")

v4.19.134: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
    5342e7093ff2 ("firmware: Factor out the paged buffer handling code")
    82fd7a8142a1 ("firmware: Add support for loading compressed files")
    8f58570b98c0 ("firmware: Unify the paged buffer release helper")
    901cff7cb961 ("firmware_loader: load files from the mount namespace of init")
    993f5d11a963 ("firmware: Use kvmalloc for page tables")
    ddaf29fd9bb6 ("firmware: Free temporary page table after vmapping")
    eac473bce4b7 ("firmware: hardcode the debug message for -ENOENT")

v4.14.189: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
    02c399306826 ("firmware_loader: enhance Kconfig documentation over FW_LOADER")
    06bfd3c8ab1d ("firmware_loader: move kconfig FW_LOADER entries to its own file")
    367d09824193 ("firmware_loader: replace ---help--- with help")
    7f55c733b660 ("firmware: Drop FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL Kconfig option")
    82fd7a8142a1 ("firmware: Add support for loading compressed files")

v4.9.231: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
    0015a978a254 ("s390: fix zfcpdump-config")
    02c399306826 ("firmware_loader: enhance Kconfig documentation over FW_LOADER")
    06bfd3c8ab1d ("firmware_loader: move kconfig FW_LOADER entries to its own file")
    16ddcc34b8bd ("s390: update defconfig")
    1d9995771fcb ("s390: update defconfigs")
    6b0b7551428e ("perf/core: Rename CONFIG_[UK]PROBE_EVENT to CONFIG_[UK]PROBE_EVENTS")
    7f55c733b660 ("firmware: Drop FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL Kconfig option")
    80abb39b504e ("s390: update defconfig")
    82fd7a8142a1 ("firmware: Add support for loading compressed files")
    a518d63777a4 ("ARC: [plat-hsdk] initial port for HSDK board")
    c7ff87409d1a ("m68k/defconfig: Update defconfigs for v4.10-rc1")
    dafba3f6fb86 ("ARM: tegra: Enable GMI driver in default configuration")


NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.

How should we proceed with this patch?

-- 
Thanks
Sasha

Re: [PATCH v3 05/19] fs/kernel_read_file: Remove FIRMWARE_EFI_EMBEDDED enum

[Sasha Levin]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1529 bytes --]

Hi

[This is an automated email]

This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag
fixing commit: 548193cba2a7 ("test_firmware: add support for firmware_request_platform").

The bot has tested the following trees: v5.7.10.

v5.7.10: Build failed! Errors:
    drivers/firmware/efi/embedded-firmware.c:25:38: error: static declaration of ‘efi_embedded_fw_list’ follows non-static declaration
    drivers/firmware/efi/embedded-firmware.c:26:33: error: static declaration of ‘efi_embedded_fw_checked’ follows non-static declaration
    drivers/firmware/efi/embedded-firmware.c:25:38: error: static declaration of ‘efi_embedded_fw_list’ follows non-static declaration
    drivers/firmware/efi/embedded-firmware.c:26:33: error: static declaration of ‘efi_embedded_fw_checked’ follows non-static declaration
    drivers/firmware/efi/embedded-firmware.c:25:38: error: static declaration of ‘efi_embedded_fw_list’ follows non-static declaration
    drivers/firmware/efi/embedded-firmware.c:26:33: error: static declaration of ‘efi_embedded_fw_checked’ follows non-static declaration
    drivers/firmware/efi/embedded-firmware.c:25:38: error: static declaration of ‘efi_embedded_fw_list’ follows non-static declaration
    drivers/firmware/efi/embedded-firmware.c:26:33: error: static declaration of ‘efi_embedded_fw_checked’ follows non-static declaration


NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.

How should we proceed with this patch?

-- 
Thanks
Sasha