From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Dima Stepanov <dimastep@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, bjorn@helgaas.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19.y] PCI: Probe bridge window attributes once at enumeration-time
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 16:54:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200810145450.GC3869733@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1597069182-5075-1-git-send-email-dimastep@yandex-team.ru>
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 05:19:42PM +0300, Dima Stepanov wrote:
> From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
>
> commit 51c48b310183ab6ba5419edfc6a8de889cc04521 upstream.
>
> pci_bridge_check_ranges() determines whether a bridge supports the optional
> I/O and prefetchable memory windows and sets the flag bits in the bridge
> resources. This *could* be done once during enumeration except that the
> resource allocation code completely clears the flag bits, e.g., in the
> pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources() path.
>
> The problem with pci_bridge_check_ranges() in the resource allocation path
> is that we may allocate resources after devices have been claimed by
> drivers, and pci_bridge_check_ranges() *changes* the window registers to
> determine whether they're writable. This may break concurrent accesses to
> devices behind the bridge.
>
> Add a new pci_read_bridge_windows() to determine whether a bridge supports
> the optional windows, call it once during enumeration, remember the
> results, and change pci_bridge_check_ranges() so it doesn't touch the
> bridge windows but sets the flag bits based on those remembered results.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/1506151482-113560-1-git-send-email-wangzhou1@hisilicon.com
> Link: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-12/msg02082.html
> Reported-by: Yandong Xu <xuyandong2@huawei.com>
> Tested-by: Yandong Xu <xuyandong2@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
> Cc: Ofer Hayut <ofer@lightbitslabs.com>
> Cc: Roy Shterman <roys@lightbitslabs.com>
> Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
> Cc: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208371
> Signed-off-by: Dima Stepanov <dimastep@yandex-team.ru>
> ---
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/pci/setup-bus.c | 45 ++++--------------------------------------
> include/linux/pci.h | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
Why is this now needed in 4.19.y? What changed to require it and what
prevents the users from just using 5.4.y instead?
A bit of an explaination when backporting patches that are not obvious
"fixes" to much older kernels is always appreciated :)
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-10 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-10 14:19 [PATCH 4.19.y] PCI: Probe bridge window attributes once at enumeration-time Dima Stepanov
2020-08-10 14:54 ` Greg KH [this message]
2020-08-11 8:09 ` Dima Stepanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200810145450.GC3869733@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bjorn@helgaas.com \
--cc=dimastep@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox