From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Maling list - DRI developers <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"for 3.8" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "drm/radeon: handle PCIe root ports with addressing limitations"
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 19:27:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200917172715.GA8325@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADnq5_P9nEZDiB0Fx_tsK1GCB_NJ-AOnx7Fd=706tZ4aKrmPzA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 06:16:25PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 3:04 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 02:46:07PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > > This change breaks tons of systems.
> >
> > Did you do at least some basic root causing on why? Do GPUs get
> > fed address they can't deal with? Any examples?
> >
> > Bug 1 doesn't seem to contain any analysis and was reported against
> > a very old kernel that had all kind of fixes since.
> >
> > Bug 2 seems to imply a drm kthread is accessing some structure it
> > shouldn't, which would imply a mismatch between pools used by radeon
> > now and those actually provided by the core. Something that should
> > be pretty to trivial to fix for someone understanding the whole ttm
> > pool maze.
> >
> > Bug 3: same as 1, but an even older kernel.
> >
> > Bug 4: looks like 1 and 3, and actually verified to work properly
> > in 5.9-rc. Did you try to get the other reporters test this as well?
>
> It would appear that the change in 5.9 to disable AGP on radeon fixed
> the issue. I'm following up on the other tickets to see if I can get
> confirmation. On another thread[1], the user was able to avoid the
> issue by disabling HIMEM. Looks like some issue with HIMEM and/or
> AGP.
Thanks. I'll try to spend some time to figure out what could be
highmem related. I'd much rather get this fixed properly.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-17 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-15 18:46 [PATCH] Revert "drm/radeon: handle PCIe root ports with addressing limitations" Alex Deucher
2020-09-16 6:33 ` Greg KH
2020-09-16 9:59 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-16 13:08 ` Alex Deucher
2020-09-16 7:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-16 22:16 ` Alex Deucher
2020-09-17 17:27 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200917172715.GA8325@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).