Re: [PATCH] vt: Disable KD_FONT_OP_COPY

[Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>]

On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 11:30:18AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 10:56 AM Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 08:57:38AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 7:35 PM Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 05:13:35PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 04:41:35PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 7:41 PM Linus Torvalds
> > > > > > <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 1:29 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It's buggy:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ack. Who is taking this? Should I do it directly, or expect this
> > > > > > > through Greg's tty/char tree, or what?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've sent out v2 with more archive links, typo in commit message fixed
> > > > > > and ack from Peilin added. I'll leave merging up to you guys. Note
> > > > > > that cc: stable still needs to be added, I left that out to avoid an
> > > > > > accidental leak.
> > > > >
> > > > > Great, I'll grab this now and add it to my tty tree and send it to Linus
> > > > > later today.
> > > > >
> > > > > Unless I should be holding off somehow on this?  I didn't see anyone
> > > > > wanting to embargo this, or did I miss it?
> > > >
> > > > Given that Minh didn't ask for any embargo, and it's good to get this
> > > > fixed as soon as possible, I've queued this up and will send it to Linus
> > > > in a few minutes.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks all for the quick response,
> > >
> > > cc: stable didn't get added I think.
> > >
> > > Stable teams, please backport commit 3c4e0dff2095 ("vt: Disable
> > > KD_FONT_OP_COPY") to all supported kernels.
> >
> > I was going to do that given that I am the same person :)
> 
> I thought there's some lts that aren't maintained by you?

Not anymore, no :(

> And distro teams who randomly still misalign with lts somehow ...

Those "teams" are so far out on their own, they insist they have their
own ways of devining which patches to apply and which to ignore that I
am pretty sure have nothing to do with the stable@ mailing list last I
was told.  But I could be wrong, anyway, no harm, I'd much rather be
reminded of things I'm already planning on doing than to miss anything,
thanks!

greg k-h