From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
abelits@marvell.com, davem@davemloft.net,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 35/36] Revert "lib: Restrict cpumask_local_spread to houskeeping CPUs"
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 12:58:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210208175806.2091668-35-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210208175806.2091668-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[ Upstream commit 2452483d9546de1c540f330469dc4042ff089731 ]
This reverts commit 1abdfe706a579a702799fce465bceb9fb01d407c.
This change is broken and not solving any problem it claims to solve.
Robin reported that cpumask_local_spread() now returns any cpu out of
cpu_possible_mask in case that NOHZ_FULL is disabled (runtime or compile
time). It can also return any offline or not-present CPU in the
housekeeping mask. Before that it was returning a CPU out of
online_cpu_mask.
While the function is racy against CPU hotplug if the caller does not
protect against it, the actual use cases are not caring much about it as
they use it mostly as hint for:
- the user space affinity hint which is unused by the kernel
- memory node selection which is just suboptimal
- network queue affinity which might fail but is handled gracefully
But the occasional fail vs. hotplug is very different from returning
anything from possible_cpu_mask which can have a large amount of offline
CPUs obviously.
The changelog of the commit claims:
"The current implementation of cpumask_local_spread() does not respect
the isolated CPUs, i.e., even if a CPU has been isolated for Real-Time
task, it will return it to the caller for pinning of its IRQ
threads. Having these unwanted IRQ threads on an isolated CPU adds up
to a latency overhead."
The only correct part of this changelog is:
"The current implementation of cpumask_local_spread() does not respect
the isolated CPUs."
Everything else is just disjunct from reality.
Reported-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: abelits@marvell.com
Cc: davem@davemloft.net
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87y2g26tnt.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
lib/cpumask.c | 16 +++++-----------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/cpumask.c b/lib/cpumask.c
index 85da6ab4fbb5a..fb22fb266f937 100644
--- a/lib/cpumask.c
+++ b/lib/cpumask.c
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/memblock.h>
#include <linux/numa.h>
-#include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
/**
* cpumask_next - get the next cpu in a cpumask
@@ -206,27 +205,22 @@ void __init free_bootmem_cpumask_var(cpumask_var_t mask)
*/
unsigned int cpumask_local_spread(unsigned int i, int node)
{
- int cpu, hk_flags;
- const struct cpumask *mask;
+ int cpu;
- hk_flags = HK_FLAG_DOMAIN | HK_FLAG_MANAGED_IRQ;
- mask = housekeeping_cpumask(hk_flags);
/* Wrap: we always want a cpu. */
- i %= cpumask_weight(mask);
+ i %= num_online_cpus();
if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
- for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask)
if (i-- == 0)
return cpu;
- }
} else {
/* NUMA first. */
- for_each_cpu_and(cpu, cpumask_of_node(node), mask) {
+ for_each_cpu_and(cpu, cpumask_of_node(node), cpu_online_mask)
if (i-- == 0)
return cpu;
- }
- for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask) {
/* Skip NUMA nodes, done above. */
if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpumask_of_node(node)))
continue;
--
2.27.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-08 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-08 17:57 [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 01/36] soc: ti: omap-prm: Fix boot time errors for rst_map_012 bits 0 and 1 Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 02/36] arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix PCIe DT properties on rk3399 Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 03/36] Input: goodix - add support for Goodix GT9286 chip Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 04/36] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Reserve LPASS clocks in gcc Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 05/36] ARM: OMAP2+: Fix suspcious RCU usage splats for omap_enter_idle_coupled Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 06/36] arm64: dts: rockchip: remove interrupt-names property from rk3399 vdec node Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 07/36] kbuild: simplify GCC_PLUGINS enablement in dummy-tools/gcc Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 08/36] Input: xpad - sync supported devices with fork on GitHub Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 09/36] platform/x86: hp-wmi: Disable tablet-mode reporting by default Sasha Levin
2021-02-10 23:22 ` mark gross
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 10/36] arm64: dts: rockchip: Disable display for NanoPi R2S Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 11/36] ovl: perform vfs_getxattr() with mounter creds Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 12/36] cap: fix conversions on getxattr Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 13/36] ovl: skip getxattr of security labels Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 14/36] media: rkisp1: uapi: change hist_bins array type from __u16 to __u32 Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 20:46 ` Hans Verkuil
2021-02-09 12:45 ` Dafna Hirschfeld
2021-02-09 13:02 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-02-09 13:39 ` Hans Verkuil
2021-02-09 13:44 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-02-10 15:33 ` Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 15/36] media: rkisp1: stats: remove a wrong cast to u8 Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 16/36] media: rkisp1: stats: mask the hist_bins values Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 17/36] scsi: lpfc: Fix EEH encountering oops with NVMe traffic Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 18/36] x86/split_lock: Enable the split lock feature on another Alder Lake CPU Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 19/36] nvme-pci: ignore the subsysem NQN on Phison E16 Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 20/36] drm/amd/display: Fix DPCD translation for LTTPR AUX_RD_INTERVAL Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 21/36] drm/amd/display: Add more Clock Sources to DCN2.1 Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 22/36] drm/amd/display: Release DSC before acquiring Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 23/36] drm/amd/display: Fix dc_sink kref count in emulated_link_detect Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 24/36] drm/amd/display: Free atomic state after drm_atomic_commit Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 25/36] drm/amd/display: Decrement refcount of dc_sink before reassignment Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 26/36] riscv: virt_addr_valid must check the address belongs to linear mapping Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 27/36] bfq-iosched: Revert "bfq: Fix computation of shallow depth" Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 28/36] ARM: dts: lpc32xx: Revert set default clock rate of HCLK PLL Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:57 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 29/36] kallsyms: fix nonconverging kallsyms table with lld Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:58 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 30/36] ARM: ensure the signal page contains defined contents Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:58 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 31/36] ARM: kexec: fix oops after TLB are invalidated Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:58 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 32/36] init/gcov: allow CONFIG_CONSTRUCTORS on UML to fix module gcov Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:58 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 33/36] kasan: add explicit preconditions to kasan_report() Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:58 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 34/36] ubsan: implement __ubsan_handle_alignment_assumption Sasha Levin
2021-02-08 17:58 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2021-02-08 17:58 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 36/36] x86/efi: Remove EFI PGD build time checks Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210208175806.2091668-35-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=abelits@marvell.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=nitesh@redhat.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox