public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kernel-team@android.com,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH][stable-5.10] KVM: arm64: Ensure I-cache isolation between vcpus of a same VM
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 11:11:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210315111111.4136402-1-maz@kernel.org> (raw)

Commit 01dc9262ff5797b675c32c0c6bc682777d23de05 upstream.

It recently became apparent that the ARMv8 architecture has interesting
rules regarding attributes being used when fetching instructions
if the MMU is off at Stage-1.

In this situation, the CPU is allowed to fetch from the PoC and
allocate into the I-cache (unless the memory is mapped with
the XN attribute at Stage-2).

If we transpose this to vcpus sharing a single physical CPU,
it is possible for a vcpu running with its MMU off to influence
another vcpu running with its MMU on, as the latter is expected to
fetch from the PoU (and self-patching code doesn't flush below that
level).

In order to solve this, reuse the vcpu-private TLB invalidation
code to apply the same policy to the I-cache, nuking it every time
the vcpu runs on a physical CPU that ran another vcpu of the same
VM in the past.

This involve renaming __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid() to
__kvm_flush_cpu_context(), and inserting a local i-cache invalidation
there.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210303164505.68492-1-maz@kernel.org
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h   | 4 ++--
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c               | 7 ++++++-
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c | 4 ++--
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/tlb.c      | 3 ++-
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/tlb.c       | 3 ++-
 5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
index 54387ccd1ab2..044bb9e2cd74 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
 #define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_flush_vm_context		2
 #define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa		3
 #define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid		4
-#define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid	5
+#define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_flush_cpu_context		5
 #define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_timer_set_cntvoff		6
 #define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_enable_ssbs			7
 #define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___vgic_v3_get_ich_vtr_el2		8
@@ -180,10 +180,10 @@ DECLARE_KVM_HYP_SYM(__bp_harden_hyp_vecs);
 #define __bp_harden_hyp_vecs	CHOOSE_HYP_SYM(__bp_harden_hyp_vecs)
 
 extern void __kvm_flush_vm_context(void);
+extern void __kvm_flush_cpu_context(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu);
 extern void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, phys_addr_t ipa,
 				     int level);
 extern void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu);
-extern void __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu);
 
 extern void __kvm_timer_set_cntvoff(u64 cntvoff);
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index c0ffb019ca8b..a1c2c955474e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -352,11 +352,16 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
 	last_ran = this_cpu_ptr(mmu->last_vcpu_ran);
 
 	/*
+	 * We guarantee that both TLBs and I-cache are private to each
+	 * vcpu. If detecting that a vcpu from the same VM has
+	 * previously run on the same physical CPU, call into the
+	 * hypervisor code to nuke the relevant contexts.
+	 *
 	 * We might get preempted before the vCPU actually runs, but
 	 * over-invalidation doesn't affect correctness.
 	 */
 	if (*last_ran != vcpu->vcpu_id) {
-		kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid, mmu);
+		kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_flush_cpu_context, mmu);
 		*last_ran = vcpu->vcpu_id;
 	}
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
index e2eafe2c93af..3df30b459215 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
@@ -46,11 +46,11 @@ static void handle_host_hcall(unsigned long func_id,
 		__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(kern_hyp_va(mmu));
 		break;
 	}
-	case KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC(__kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid): {
+	case KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC(__kvm_flush_cpu_context): {
 		unsigned long r1 = host_ctxt->regs.regs[1];
 		struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = (struct kvm_s2_mmu *)r1;
 
-		__kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(kern_hyp_va(mmu));
+		__kvm_flush_cpu_context(kern_hyp_va(mmu));
 		break;
 	}
 	case KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC(__kvm_timer_set_cntvoff): {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/tlb.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/tlb.c
index fbde89a2c6e8..229b06748c20 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/tlb.c
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
 	__tlb_switch_to_host(&cxt);
 }
 
-void __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
+void __kvm_flush_cpu_context(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
 {
 	struct tlb_inv_context cxt;
 
@@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ void __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
 	__tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt);
 
 	__tlbi(vmalle1);
+	asm volatile("ic iallu");
 	dsb(nsh);
 	isb();
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/tlb.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/tlb.c
index fd7895945bbc..66f17349f0c3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/tlb.c
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
 	__tlb_switch_to_host(&cxt);
 }
 
-void __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
+void __kvm_flush_cpu_context(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
 {
 	struct tlb_inv_context cxt;
 
@@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ void __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
 	__tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt);
 
 	__tlbi(vmalle1);
+	asm volatile("ic iallu");
 	dsb(nsh);
 	isb();
 
-- 
2.29.2


                 reply	other threads:[~2021-03-15 11:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210315111111.4136402-1-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox