* [PATCH][stable-5.10] KVM: arm64: Ensure I-cache isolation between vcpus of a same VM
@ 2021-03-15 11:11 Marc Zyngier
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2021-03-15 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh; +Cc: kvmarm, kernel-team, stable, Will Deacon, Catalin Marinas
Commit 01dc9262ff5797b675c32c0c6bc682777d23de05 upstream.
It recently became apparent that the ARMv8 architecture has interesting
rules regarding attributes being used when fetching instructions
if the MMU is off at Stage-1.
In this situation, the CPU is allowed to fetch from the PoC and
allocate into the I-cache (unless the memory is mapped with
the XN attribute at Stage-2).
If we transpose this to vcpus sharing a single physical CPU,
it is possible for a vcpu running with its MMU off to influence
another vcpu running with its MMU on, as the latter is expected to
fetch from the PoU (and self-patching code doesn't flush below that
level).
In order to solve this, reuse the vcpu-private TLB invalidation
code to apply the same policy to the I-cache, nuking it every time
the vcpu runs on a physical CPU that ran another vcpu of the same
VM in the past.
This involve renaming __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid() to
__kvm_flush_cpu_context(), and inserting a local i-cache invalidation
there.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210303164505.68492-1-maz@kernel.org
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h | 4 ++--
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 7 ++++++-
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c | 4 ++--
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/tlb.c | 3 ++-
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/tlb.c | 3 ++-
5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
index 54387ccd1ab2..044bb9e2cd74 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
#define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_flush_vm_context 2
#define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa 3
#define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid 4
-#define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid 5
+#define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_flush_cpu_context 5
#define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_timer_set_cntvoff 6
#define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_enable_ssbs 7
#define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___vgic_v3_get_ich_vtr_el2 8
@@ -180,10 +180,10 @@ DECLARE_KVM_HYP_SYM(__bp_harden_hyp_vecs);
#define __bp_harden_hyp_vecs CHOOSE_HYP_SYM(__bp_harden_hyp_vecs)
extern void __kvm_flush_vm_context(void);
+extern void __kvm_flush_cpu_context(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu);
extern void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, phys_addr_t ipa,
int level);
extern void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu);
-extern void __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu);
extern void __kvm_timer_set_cntvoff(u64 cntvoff);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index c0ffb019ca8b..a1c2c955474e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -352,11 +352,16 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
last_ran = this_cpu_ptr(mmu->last_vcpu_ran);
/*
+ * We guarantee that both TLBs and I-cache are private to each
+ * vcpu. If detecting that a vcpu from the same VM has
+ * previously run on the same physical CPU, call into the
+ * hypervisor code to nuke the relevant contexts.
+ *
* We might get preempted before the vCPU actually runs, but
* over-invalidation doesn't affect correctness.
*/
if (*last_ran != vcpu->vcpu_id) {
- kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid, mmu);
+ kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_flush_cpu_context, mmu);
*last_ran = vcpu->vcpu_id;
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
index e2eafe2c93af..3df30b459215 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
@@ -46,11 +46,11 @@ static void handle_host_hcall(unsigned long func_id,
__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(kern_hyp_va(mmu));
break;
}
- case KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC(__kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid): {
+ case KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC(__kvm_flush_cpu_context): {
unsigned long r1 = host_ctxt->regs.regs[1];
struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = (struct kvm_s2_mmu *)r1;
- __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(kern_hyp_va(mmu));
+ __kvm_flush_cpu_context(kern_hyp_va(mmu));
break;
}
case KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC(__kvm_timer_set_cntvoff): {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/tlb.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/tlb.c
index fbde89a2c6e8..229b06748c20 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/tlb.c
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
__tlb_switch_to_host(&cxt);
}
-void __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
+void __kvm_flush_cpu_context(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
{
struct tlb_inv_context cxt;
@@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ void __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
__tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt);
__tlbi(vmalle1);
+ asm volatile("ic iallu");
dsb(nsh);
isb();
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/tlb.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/tlb.c
index fd7895945bbc..66f17349f0c3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/tlb.c
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
__tlb_switch_to_host(&cxt);
}
-void __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
+void __kvm_flush_cpu_context(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
{
struct tlb_inv_context cxt;
@@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ void __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
__tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt);
__tlbi(vmalle1);
+ asm volatile("ic iallu");
dsb(nsh);
isb();
--
2.29.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-03-15 11:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-15 11:11 [PATCH][stable-5.10] KVM: arm64: Ensure I-cache isolation between vcpus of a same VM Marc Zyngier
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox