From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-19.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FAF9C433ED for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 10:06:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA2EF61938 for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 10:06:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235044AbhETKHh (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2021 06:07:37 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:37792 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232100AbhETKFb (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2021 06:05:31 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A257D6193B; Thu, 20 May 2021 09:41:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1621503679; bh=qURO246+2vAK3TsFBzpTuXJeHrY/IQ9PWRX/GYoR+bI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=vRGT+tF02Pfszt/RDfI9hGBeNoFZXNyjaJfb2AjB4L5GnPLQyHHXJP3WR8nE2dsgP u1vktXqRkSJoD0Ripw5vphPDuP8F7xwROe+bB4GhG2K0DIQwOJl9HByrZc6Oq3lZSu o6VuG6DZXI6RqQIc3nPZucoU+CcbW4SxgCEYMENU= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Jens Axboe , Nathan Chancellor Subject: [PATCH 4.19 296/425] smp: Fix smp_call_function_single_async prototype Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 11:21:05 +0200 Message-Id: <20210520092141.176698236@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20210520092131.308959589@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20210520092131.308959589@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: Arnd Bergmann commit 1139aeb1c521eb4a050920ce6c64c36c4f2a3ab7 upstream. As of commit 966a967116e6 ("smp: Avoid using two cache lines for struct call_single_data"), the smp code prefers 32-byte aligned call_single_data objects for performance reasons, but the block layer includes an instance of this structure in the main 'struct request' that is more senstive to size than to performance here, see 4ccafe032005 ("block: unalign call_single_data in struct request"). The result is a violation of the calling conventions that clang correctly points out: block/blk-mq.c:630:39: warning: passing 8-byte aligned argument to 32-byte aligned parameter 2 of 'smp_call_function_single_async' may result in an unaligned pointer access [-Walign-mismatch] smp_call_function_single_async(cpu, &rq->csd); It does seem that the usage of the call_single_data without cache line alignment should still be allowed by the smp code, so just change the function prototype so it accepts both, but leave the default alignment unchanged for the other users. This seems better to me than adding a local hack to shut up an otherwise correct warning in the caller. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Acked-by: Jens Axboe Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210505211300.3174456-1-arnd@kernel.org [nc: Fix conflicts] Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- include/linux/smp.h | 2 +- kernel/smp.c | 10 +++++----- kernel/up.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) --- a/include/linux/smp.h +++ b/include/linux/smp.h @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ void on_each_cpu_cond(bool (*cond_func)( smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait, gfp_t gfp_flags); -int smp_call_function_single_async(int cpu, call_single_data_t *csd); +int smp_call_function_single_async(int cpu, struct __call_single_data *csd); #ifdef CONFIG_SMP --- a/kernel/smp.c +++ b/kernel/smp.c @@ -103,12 +103,12 @@ void __init call_function_init(void) * previous function call. For multi-cpu calls its even more interesting * as we'll have to ensure no other cpu is observing our csd. */ -static __always_inline void csd_lock_wait(call_single_data_t *csd) +static __always_inline void csd_lock_wait(struct __call_single_data *csd) { smp_cond_load_acquire(&csd->flags, !(VAL & CSD_FLAG_LOCK)); } -static __always_inline void csd_lock(call_single_data_t *csd) +static __always_inline void csd_lock(struct __call_single_data *csd) { csd_lock_wait(csd); csd->flags |= CSD_FLAG_LOCK; @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static __always_inline void csd_lock(cal smp_wmb(); } -static __always_inline void csd_unlock(call_single_data_t *csd) +static __always_inline void csd_unlock(struct __call_single_data *csd) { WARN_ON(!(csd->flags & CSD_FLAG_LOCK)); @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(cal * for execution on the given CPU. data must already have * ->func, ->info, and ->flags set. */ -static int generic_exec_single(int cpu, call_single_data_t *csd, +static int generic_exec_single(int cpu, struct __call_single_data *csd, smp_call_func_t func, void *info) { if (cpu == smp_processor_id()) { @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_call_function_single); * NOTE: Be careful, there is unfortunately no current debugging facility to * validate the correctness of this serialization. */ -int smp_call_function_single_async(int cpu, call_single_data_t *csd) +int smp_call_function_single_async(int cpu, struct __call_single_data *csd) { int err = 0; --- a/kernel/up.c +++ b/kernel/up.c @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ int smp_call_function_single(int cpu, vo } EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_call_function_single); -int smp_call_function_single_async(int cpu, call_single_data_t *csd) +int smp_call_function_single_async(int cpu, struct __call_single_data *csd) { unsigned long flags;