From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCC3C48BCF for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 18:50:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94BB5613E3 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 18:50:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230212AbhFISwO (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 14:52:14 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-f174.google.com ([209.85.167.174]:42717 "EHLO mail-oi1-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229578AbhFISwO (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 14:52:14 -0400 Received: by mail-oi1-f174.google.com with SMTP id s23so3697591oiw.9; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 11:50:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=yOtPKNZ6kYpDXXCinHqgt6xSuEBl4ES+TxF9HV837Dk=; b=RlGqo0GQyV+ynXhh3Pr2YfUYpw+k/PCJfFl0pU9rRN7XtNa6vBSk71bWseVKPupdse c8dJ6K0Y9UpDnxdBpAom+qSjCJzsDf/iOVrl6T+FU+oRRUElxkJt8Tqnvn0zc3VQ5Xh1 hbXufLQYj8eUL9m1p+cRx4j1p8e6Liua33XIe3kj8UUYD8OJUIyfwOAQx21x0ANi9Wzp zQSxMhmqQEfC9wA4Gn3zp+YAGE6/4WoCeJVcc1dxm3VoyVliACcbXD3l27aExTrlJpyD BJ+ru36lUARv+z0JzX7Q9UkgN+Y3p7aF72rkmVQDfTM8dPV0zA/Jc26SeE7rXdJQPwIC 2sHQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=yOtPKNZ6kYpDXXCinHqgt6xSuEBl4ES+TxF9HV837Dk=; b=VM+iIHkkymnnIdYI8jdCdrBBysxPkyFpptsuzmZE9DAUnYeiSvoSGy7GJf2qAiUNJi /K1JmKBeLreACv6KniqoZEVowbwz6Q+W9MuvgBsYXqzhHPtM2PGaZYgUGrSYUDlgQvF4 TTPNgD0UCtEvkmSvp9hxf2v6Uxj7NvQ54jJLq4j1D/KqBw2tzQEq8ygGcmWZElS9lyD5 +N1g+tXii2QdiaNt9FrfkrZ4GE7GV5bulh0VVlbPK4d4lKW+EbO0eOPvDZL2mlwRynjG SnpS+b9g4zQ7CJ9YkGxGOnGyGHn35oZjCLyfrcou4Dv1mhZzEDhVyDDam48EeTdq+E7+ O4ZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531GDhtqfTVDk0i0qcaH4bU93w1uJ4G4CfRP1N5ForDXKIdKVzmM 19TSyrosJwC+/8X36n1UL/s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyVc5ZGFOPE+Ljb/Gj6wd+CAmsZPNJpA/5e9XUiR9WwFHgv+ghyHY9/e3mp/ZFYPQIvliwJTw== X-Received: by 2002:aca:c046:: with SMTP id q67mr7581754oif.79.1623264559412; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 11:49:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l29sm161780ots.4.2021.06.09.11.49.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 09 Jun 2021 11:49:19 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Guenter Roeck Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 11:49:17 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/78] 5.4.125-rc1 review Message-ID: <20210609184917.GE2531680@roeck-us.net> References: <20210608175935.254388043@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210608175935.254388043@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 08:26:29PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.125 release. > There are 78 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 10 Jun 2021 17:59:18 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 157 pass: 157 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 428 pass: 428 fail: 0 Tested-by: Guenter Roeck Guenter