From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-20.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E56C43214 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 04:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9345B60C41 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 04:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234237AbhGWDT0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2021 23:19:26 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38344 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234503AbhGWDSp (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2021 23:18:45 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6B1C60F36; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 03:59:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1627012756; bh=v1qiqfhFMO1GSTZsyfLloq/DE5Y82veJh03AVlehs40=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=dHnKwSGqo6IOsuouOpXC9ylT+2VZuuv8MCHZDAXTqh1DfP/nW1WZ17GT1+N8qWFYA zfkEoA+FRCGGpyce7MT/9tX7vRSinzrt9NtXt4H8K9sh9zYuUJw9kVVXFJQVOcbgvn /jmsbVT5mLFc9xmTrbivByUzo9endTnqZ2xCidYbA0ZA1+fzCRq3bGRVriqltun3OZ yrnOBtNI1IZ+M4PdNPfEWRD1SUzALlekOP1cLDOSFbECxd3dF80btX+HyI4EHnDjT7 v3x/ZosSFltvr3eecpLAcylfzM6L8MFaAAQBreDKm2UHtU3uPTsVqjemP9ILyKIU5W R22651jpbZpfw== From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi , syzbot+b718ec84a87b7e73ade4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, Viacheslav Dubeyko , Al Viro , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Gustavo A . R . Silva" , Shuah Khan , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Sasha Levin , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 6/7] hfs: add lock nesting notation to hfs_find_init Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 23:59:05 -0400 Message-Id: <20210723035906.532444-6-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <20210723035906.532444-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20210723035906.532444-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi [ Upstream commit b3b2177a2d795e35dc11597b2609eb1e7e57e570 ] Syzbot reports a possible recursive lock in [1]. This happens due to missing lock nesting information. From the logs, we see that a call to hfs_fill_super is made to mount the hfs filesystem. While searching for the root inode, the lock on the catalog btree is grabbed. Then, when the parent of the root isn't found, a call to __hfs_bnode_create is made to create the parent of the root. This eventually leads to a call to hfs_ext_read_extent which grabs a lock on the extents btree. Since the order of locking is catalog btree -> extents btree, this lock hierarchy does not lead to a deadlock. To tell lockdep that this locking is safe, we add nesting notation to distinguish between catalog btrees, extents btrees, and attributes btrees (for HFS+). This has already been done in hfsplus. Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=f007ef1d7a31a469e3be7aeb0fde0769b18585db [1] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210701030756.58760-4-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi Reported-by: syzbot+b718ec84a87b7e73ade4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: syzbot+b718ec84a87b7e73ade4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko Cc: Al Viro Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva Cc: Shuah Khan Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/hfs/bfind.c | 14 +++++++++++++- fs/hfs/btree.h | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/hfs/bfind.c b/fs/hfs/bfind.c index de69d8a24f6d..7f2ef95dcd05 100644 --- a/fs/hfs/bfind.c +++ b/fs/hfs/bfind.c @@ -24,7 +24,19 @@ int hfs_find_init(struct hfs_btree *tree, struct hfs_find_data *fd) fd->key = ptr + tree->max_key_len + 2; hfs_dbg(BNODE_REFS, "find_init: %d (%p)\n", tree->cnid, __builtin_return_address(0)); - mutex_lock(&tree->tree_lock); + switch (tree->cnid) { + case HFS_CAT_CNID: + mutex_lock_nested(&tree->tree_lock, CATALOG_BTREE_MUTEX); + break; + case HFS_EXT_CNID: + mutex_lock_nested(&tree->tree_lock, EXTENTS_BTREE_MUTEX); + break; + case HFS_ATTR_CNID: + mutex_lock_nested(&tree->tree_lock, ATTR_BTREE_MUTEX); + break; + default: + return -EINVAL; + } return 0; } diff --git a/fs/hfs/btree.h b/fs/hfs/btree.h index 2715f416b5a8..308b5f1af65b 100644 --- a/fs/hfs/btree.h +++ b/fs/hfs/btree.h @@ -12,6 +12,13 @@ typedef int (*btree_keycmp)(const btree_key *, const btree_key *); #define NODE_HASH_SIZE 256 +/* B-tree mutex nested subclasses */ +enum hfs_btree_mutex_classes { + CATALOG_BTREE_MUTEX, + EXTENTS_BTREE_MUTEX, + ATTR_BTREE_MUTEX, +}; + /* A HFS BTree held in memory */ struct hfs_btree { struct super_block *sb; -- 2.30.2