From: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4] PCI: Fix pci_host_bridge struct device release/free handling
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 01:08:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211004060838.678790-1-tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
commit 9885440b16b8fc1dd7275800fd28f56a92f60896 upstream.
The PCI code has several paths where the struct pci_host_bridge is freed
directly. This is wrong because it contains a struct device which is
refcounted and should be freed using put_device(). This can result in
use-after-free errors. I think this problem has existed since 2012 with
commit 7b5436635800 ("PCI: add generic device into pci_host_bridge
struct"). It generally hasn't mattered as most host bridge drivers are
still built-in and can't unbind.
The problem is a struct device should never be freed directly once
device_initialize() is called and a ref is held, but that doesn't happen
until pci_register_host_bridge(). There's then a window between allocating
the host bridge and pci_register_host_bridge() where kfree should be used.
This is fragile and requires callers to do the right thing. To fix this, we
need to split device_register() into device_initialize() and device_add()
calls, so that the host bridge struct is always freed by using a
put_device().
devm_pci_alloc_host_bridge() is using devm_kzalloc() to allocate struct
pci_host_bridge which will be freed directly. Instead, we can use a custom
devres action to call put_device().
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200513223859.11295-2-robh@kernel.org
Reported-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
[tyhicks: Minor contextual change in pci_init_host_bridge() due to the
lack of a native_dpc member in the pci_host_bridge struct. It was added
in v5.7 with commit ac1c8e35a326 ("PCI/DPC: Add Error Disconnect
Recover (EDR) support")]
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
---
This commit has been identified as a fix for random memory corruption
that we're experiencing in production. The memory corruption is easily
reproducible on 5.4.150 and we get a nice KASAN splat that led us to
discovering the upstream fix that wasn't marked for stable inclusion. I
don't see any obvious reasons why this wouldn't be a valid linux-5.4.y
candidate and hope we can get it applied there.
I've verified that the KASAN splat goes away and I don't see any other
evidence of the memory corruption issue once this commit is applied to
5.4.150.
drivers/pci/probe.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
drivers/pci/remove.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index f28213b62527..a41d04c57642 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ static struct pci_bus *pci_alloc_bus(struct pci_bus *parent)
return b;
}
-static void devm_pci_release_host_bridge_dev(struct device *dev)
+static void pci_release_host_bridge_dev(struct device *dev)
{
struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = to_pci_host_bridge(dev);
@@ -573,12 +573,7 @@ static void devm_pci_release_host_bridge_dev(struct device *dev)
pci_free_resource_list(&bridge->windows);
pci_free_resource_list(&bridge->dma_ranges);
-}
-
-static void pci_release_host_bridge_dev(struct device *dev)
-{
- devm_pci_release_host_bridge_dev(dev);
- kfree(to_pci_host_bridge(dev));
+ kfree(bridge);
}
static void pci_init_host_bridge(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
@@ -597,6 +592,8 @@ static void pci_init_host_bridge(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
bridge->native_shpc_hotplug = 1;
bridge->native_pme = 1;
bridge->native_ltr = 1;
+
+ device_initialize(&bridge->dev);
}
struct pci_host_bridge *pci_alloc_host_bridge(size_t priv)
@@ -614,17 +611,25 @@ struct pci_host_bridge *pci_alloc_host_bridge(size_t priv)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_alloc_host_bridge);
+static void devm_pci_alloc_host_bridge_release(void *data)
+{
+ pci_free_host_bridge(data);
+}
+
struct pci_host_bridge *devm_pci_alloc_host_bridge(struct device *dev,
size_t priv)
{
+ int ret;
struct pci_host_bridge *bridge;
- bridge = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*bridge) + priv, GFP_KERNEL);
+ bridge = pci_alloc_host_bridge(priv);
if (!bridge)
return NULL;
- pci_init_host_bridge(bridge);
- bridge->dev.release = devm_pci_release_host_bridge_dev;
+ ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, devm_pci_alloc_host_bridge_release,
+ bridge);
+ if (ret)
+ return NULL;
return bridge;
}
@@ -632,10 +637,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(devm_pci_alloc_host_bridge);
void pci_free_host_bridge(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
{
- pci_free_resource_list(&bridge->windows);
- pci_free_resource_list(&bridge->dma_ranges);
-
- kfree(bridge);
+ put_device(&bridge->dev);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_free_host_bridge);
@@ -866,7 +868,7 @@ static int pci_register_host_bridge(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
if (err)
goto free;
- err = device_register(&bridge->dev);
+ err = device_add(&bridge->dev);
if (err) {
put_device(&bridge->dev);
goto free;
@@ -933,7 +935,7 @@ static int pci_register_host_bridge(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
unregister:
put_device(&bridge->dev);
- device_unregister(&bridge->dev);
+ device_del(&bridge->dev);
free:
kfree(bus);
@@ -2945,7 +2947,7 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
return bridge->bus;
err_out:
- kfree(bridge);
+ put_device(&bridge->dev);
return NULL;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_create_root_bus);
diff --git a/drivers/pci/remove.c b/drivers/pci/remove.c
index e9c6b120cf45..95dec03d9f2a 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/remove.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/remove.c
@@ -160,6 +160,6 @@ void pci_remove_root_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
host_bridge->bus = NULL;
/* remove the host bridge */
- device_unregister(&host_bridge->dev);
+ device_del(&host_bridge->dev);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_remove_root_bus);
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-10-04 6:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-04 6:08 Tyler Hicks [this message]
2021-10-04 10:46 ` [PATCH 5.4] PCI: Fix pci_host_bridge struct device release/free handling Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211004060838.678790-1-tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox