From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Nobuhiro Iwamatsu (CIP)" <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 10/10] lib/timerqueue: Rely on rbtree semantics for next timer
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 13:27:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211008112714.780766407@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211008112714.445637990@linuxfoundation.org>
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
commit 511885d7061eda3eb1faf3f57dcc936ff75863f1 upstream.
Simplify the timerqueue code by using cached rbtrees and rely on the tree
leftmost node semantics to get the timer with earliest expiration time.
This is a drop in conversion, and therefore semantics remain untouched.
The runtime overhead of cached rbtrees is be pretty much the same as the
current head->next method, noting that when removing the leftmost node,
a common operation for the timerqueue, the rb_next(leftmost) is O(1) as
well, so the next timer will either be the right node or its parent.
Therefore no extra pointer chasing. Finally, the size of the struct
timerqueue_head remains the same.
Passes several hours of rcutorture.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190724152323.bojciei3muvfxalm@linux-r8p5
Reference: CVE-2021-20317
Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu (CIP) <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
include/linux/timerqueue.h | 13 ++++++-------
lib/timerqueue.c | 30 ++++++++++++------------------
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/timerqueue.h
+++ b/include/linux/timerqueue.h
@@ -12,8 +12,7 @@ struct timerqueue_node {
};
struct timerqueue_head {
- struct rb_root head;
- struct timerqueue_node *next;
+ struct rb_root_cached rb_root;
};
@@ -29,13 +28,14 @@ extern struct timerqueue_node *timerqueu
*
* @head: head of timerqueue
*
- * Returns a pointer to the timer node that has the
- * earliest expiration time.
+ * Returns a pointer to the timer node that has the earliest expiration time.
*/
static inline
struct timerqueue_node *timerqueue_getnext(struct timerqueue_head *head)
{
- return head->next;
+ struct rb_node *leftmost = rb_first_cached(&head->rb_root);
+
+ return rb_entry(leftmost, struct timerqueue_node, node);
}
static inline void timerqueue_init(struct timerqueue_node *node)
@@ -45,7 +45,6 @@ static inline void timerqueue_init(struc
static inline void timerqueue_init_head(struct timerqueue_head *head)
{
- head->head = RB_ROOT;
- head->next = NULL;
+ head->rb_root = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
}
#endif /* _LINUX_TIMERQUEUE_H */
--- a/lib/timerqueue.c
+++ b/lib/timerqueue.c
@@ -38,9 +38,10 @@
*/
bool timerqueue_add(struct timerqueue_head *head, struct timerqueue_node *node)
{
- struct rb_node **p = &head->head.rb_node;
+ struct rb_node **p = &head->rb_root.rb_root.rb_node;
struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
- struct timerqueue_node *ptr;
+ struct timerqueue_node *ptr;
+ bool leftmost = true;
/* Make sure we don't add nodes that are already added */
WARN_ON_ONCE(!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&node->node));
@@ -48,19 +49,17 @@ bool timerqueue_add(struct timerqueue_he
while (*p) {
parent = *p;
ptr = rb_entry(parent, struct timerqueue_node, node);
- if (node->expires < ptr->expires)
+ if (node->expires < ptr->expires) {
p = &(*p)->rb_left;
- else
+ } else {
p = &(*p)->rb_right;
+ leftmost = false;
+ }
}
rb_link_node(&node->node, parent, p);
- rb_insert_color(&node->node, &head->head);
+ rb_insert_color_cached(&node->node, &head->rb_root, leftmost);
- if (!head->next || node->expires < head->next->expires) {
- head->next = node;
- return true;
- }
- return false;
+ return leftmost;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(timerqueue_add);
@@ -76,15 +75,10 @@ bool timerqueue_del(struct timerqueue_he
{
WARN_ON_ONCE(RB_EMPTY_NODE(&node->node));
- /* update next pointer */
- if (head->next == node) {
- struct rb_node *rbn = rb_next(&node->node);
-
- head->next = rb_entry_safe(rbn, struct timerqueue_node, node);
- }
- rb_erase(&node->node, &head->head);
+ rb_erase_cached(&node->node, &head->rb_root);
RB_CLEAR_NODE(&node->node);
- return head->next != NULL;
+
+ return !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&head->rb_root.rb_root);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(timerqueue_del);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-08 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-08 11:27 [PATCH 4.14 00/10] 4.14.250-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-10-08 11:27 ` [PATCH 4.14 01/10] net: mdio: introduce a shutdown method to mdio device drivers Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-10-08 11:27 ` [PATCH 4.14 02/10] xen-netback: correct success/error reporting for the SKB-with-fraglist case Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-10-08 11:27 ` [PATCH 4.14 03/10] sparc64: fix pci_iounmap() when CONFIG_PCI is not set Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-10-08 11:27 ` [PATCH 4.14 04/10] ext2: fix sleeping in atomic bugs on error Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-10-08 11:27 ` [PATCH 4.14 05/10] scsi: sd: Free scsi_disk device via put_device() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-10-08 11:27 ` [PATCH 4.14 06/10] usb: testusb: Fix for showing the connection speed Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-10-08 11:27 ` [PATCH 4.14 07/10] usb: dwc2: check return value after calling platform_get_resource() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-10-08 11:27 ` [PATCH 4.14 08/10] scsi: ses: Retry failed Send/Receive Diagnostic commands Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-10-08 11:27 ` [PATCH 4.14 09/10] libata: Add ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_ON_ATI for Samsung 860 and 870 SSD Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-10-08 11:27 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2021-10-08 15:43 ` [PATCH 4.14 00/10] 4.14.250-rc1 review Jon Hunter
2021-10-08 21:03 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-10-09 17:57 ` Naresh Kamboju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211008112714.780766407@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=dbueso@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).