From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E368C433F5 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 08:13:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128DB60F39 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 08:13:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232532AbhKEIPn convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Nov 2021 04:15:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54974 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231837AbhKEIPn (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Nov 2021 04:15:43 -0400 Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc (Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:520::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B50A3C061714; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 01:13:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bigeasy by Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1miuL6-0000j8-5Z; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 09:12:44 +0100 Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 09:12:44 +0100 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Russell King , Arnd Bergmann , Antonio Terceiro , Naresh Kamboju , Matthias Klose , stable@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: drop cc-option fallbacks for architecture selection Message-ID: <20211105081244.brp34ec3covsuogt@flow> References: <20211018140735.3714254-1-arnd@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT In-Reply-To: <20211018140735.3714254-1-arnd@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On 2021-10-18 16:07:12 [+0200], Arnd Bergmann wrote: … > > This should be safe to apply on all stable kernels, and will be required > in order to keep building them with gcc-11 and higher. Could we get this applied, please? Matthias Klose asked gcc-upstream if the change, causing the problem, was expected/ intended. I don't think this matters given that the provided fallback does not work. Sebastian