From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
To: v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, ericvh@gmail.com, lucho@ionkov.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>,
ng@0x80.stream
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "fs/9p: search open fids first"
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2022 22:06:51 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220130130651.712293-1-asmadeus@codewreck.org> (raw)
This reverts commit 478ba09edc1f2f2ee27180a06150cb2d1a686f9c.
That commit was meant as a fix for setattrs with by fd (e.g. ftruncate)
to use an open fid instead of the first fid it found on lookup.
The proper fix for that is to use the fid associated with the open file
struct, available in iattr->ia_file for such operations, and was
actually done just before in 66246641609b ("9p: retrieve fid from file
when file instance exist.")
As such, this commit is no longer required.
Furthermore, changing lookup to return open fids first had unwanted side
effects, as it turns out the protocol forbids the use of open fids for
further walks (e.g. clone_fid) and we broke mounts for some servers
enforcing this rule.
Note this only reverts to the old working behaviour, but it's still
possible for lookup to return open fids if dentry->d_fsdata is not set,
so more work is needed to make sure we respect this rule in the future,
for example by adding a flag to the lookup functions to only match
certain fid open modes depending on caller requirements.
Fixes: 478ba09edc1f ("fs/9p: search open fids first")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.11+
Reported-by: ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reported-by: ng@0x80.stream
Signed-off-by: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
---
I'm sorry I didn't find time to check this properly fixes the clone
open fid issues, but Ron reported it did so I'll assume it did for now.
I'll try to find time to either implement the check in ganesha or use
another server -- if you have a suggestion that'd run either a ramfs or
export a local filesystem from linux I'm all ears, I couldn't get go9p
to work in the very little time I tried.
I did however check that Greg's original open/chmod 0/ftruncate pattern
works (while truncate was refused).
Also, before revert the truncate by path wasn't refused, and now is
again, so that's definitely good.
I've also tested open-unlink-ftruncate and it works properly with
ganesha, but not with qemu -- it looks like qemu tries to access the
file by path in setattr even if the fid has an associated fd, so that'd
be a qemu bug, but it's unrelated to this patch anyway.
Unless there are issues with this patch I'll send it to Linus around
Friday
fs/9p/fid.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/9p/fid.c b/fs/9p/fid.c
index 6aab046c98e2..79df61fe0e59 100644
--- a/fs/9p/fid.c
+++ b/fs/9p/fid.c
@@ -96,12 +96,8 @@ static struct p9_fid *v9fs_fid_find(struct dentry *dentry, kuid_t uid, int any)
dentry, dentry, from_kuid(&init_user_ns, uid),
any);
ret = NULL;
-
- if (d_inode(dentry))
- ret = v9fs_fid_find_inode(d_inode(dentry), uid);
-
/* we'll recheck under lock if there's anything to look in */
- if (!ret && dentry->d_fsdata) {
+ if (dentry->d_fsdata) {
struct hlist_head *h = (struct hlist_head *)&dentry->d_fsdata;
spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
@@ -113,6 +109,9 @@ static struct p9_fid *v9fs_fid_find(struct dentry *dentry, kuid_t uid, int any)
}
}
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+ } else {
+ if (dentry->d_inode)
+ ret = v9fs_fid_find_inode(dentry->d_inode, uid);
}
return ret;
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-01-30 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-30 13:06 Dominique Martinet [this message]
2022-02-04 10:52 ` [GIT PULL] 9p for 5.17-rc3 Dominique Martinet
2022-02-04 17:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-04 17:58 ` pr-tracker-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220130130651.712293-1-asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--to=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=ng@0x80.stream \
--cc=rminnich@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).