From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F077C433EF for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 09:44:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238139AbiCGJoz (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Mar 2022 04:44:55 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53616 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241023AbiCGJlq (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Mar 2022 04:41:46 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF00C673C5; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 01:39:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FEFAB8102B; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 09:39:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E38D2C340E9; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 09:39:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1646645957; bh=UEr6jH3P2BowYwBbVhZYQxWJENxUh46S+7dTIkNHJuM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UeRuYoEuzZ9blFRZqtExGr/PhY2xSp/6YrYaOnek2++L7vTChFSE/KQYr2EotHBZx GmeZvDrfZl6YCuEYgSdLes0yBX8MHQQC+R3nmZIepq+OVw2G+/2ZUC9xqNUKY714AA xb3kpKtHQ+pRlNxsXpNng7Fx0rVE4KrYGHCPS2hk= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Hou Tao , Daniel Borkmann , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.15 048/262] bpf, arm64: Use emit_addr_mov_i64() for BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 10:16:32 +0100 Message-Id: <20220307091703.876970710@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1 In-Reply-To: <20220307091702.378509770@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20220307091702.378509770@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: Hou Tao [ Upstream commit e4a41c2c1fa916547e63440c73a51a5eb06247af ] The following error is reported when running "./test_progs -t for_each" under arm64: bpf_jit: multi-func JIT bug 58 != 56 [...] JIT doesn't support bpf-to-bpf calls The root cause is the size of BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC instruction increases from 2 to 3 after the address of called bpf-function is settled and there are two bpf-to-bpf calls in test_pkt_access. The generated instructions are shown below: 0x48: 21 00 C0 D2 movz x1, #0x1, lsl #32 0x4c: 21 00 80 F2 movk x1, #0x1 0x48: E1 3F C0 92 movn x1, #0x1ff, lsl #32 0x4c: 41 FE A2 F2 movk x1, #0x17f2, lsl #16 0x50: 81 70 9F F2 movk x1, #0xfb84 Fixing it by using emit_addr_mov_i64() for BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC, so the size of jited image will not change. Fixes: 69c087ba6225 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper") Signed-off-by: Hou Tao Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211231151018.3781550-1-houtao1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 465c44d0c72fc..3d7381ffc1712 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -788,7 +788,10 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx, u64 imm64; imm64 = (u64)insn1.imm << 32 | (u32)imm; - emit_a64_mov_i64(dst, imm64, ctx); + if (bpf_pseudo_func(insn)) + emit_addr_mov_i64(dst, imm64, ctx); + else + emit_a64_mov_i64(dst, imm64, ctx); return 1; } -- 2.34.1