Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: RCU <rcu@vger.kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] rcu: Apply callbacks processing time limit only on softirq
Date: Mon,  2 May 2022 21:08:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220502190833.3352-3-urezki@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220502190833.3352-1-urezki@gmail.com>

From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>

commit a554ba288845fd3f6f12311fd76a51694233458a upstream.

Time limit only makes sense when callbacks are serviced in softirq mode
because:

_ In case we need to get back to the scheduler,
  cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs() is called after each callback.

_ In case some other softirq vector needs the CPU, the call to
  local_bh_enable() before cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs() takes care about
  them via a call to do_softirq().

Therefore, make sure the time limit only applies to softirq mode.

Fixes: cfcdef5e30469 ("rcu: Allow rcu_do_batch() to dynamically adjust batch sizes")
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com>
[UR: backport to 5.10-stable]
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index f340df6ebd86..b41009a283ca 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2456,7 +2456,7 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data *rdp)
 	div = READ_ONCE(rcu_divisor);
 	div = div < 0 ? 7 : div > sizeof(long) * 8 - 2 ? sizeof(long) * 8 - 2 : div;
 	bl = max(rdp->blimit, pending >> div);
-	if (unlikely(bl > 100)) {
+	if (in_serving_softirq() && unlikely(bl > 100)) {
 		long rrn = READ_ONCE(rcu_resched_ns);
 
 		rrn = rrn < NSEC_PER_MSEC ? NSEC_PER_MSEC : rrn > NSEC_PER_SEC ? NSEC_PER_SEC : rrn;
@@ -2494,6 +2494,18 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data *rdp)
 			if (-rcl.len >= bl && (need_resched() ||
 					(!is_idle_task(current) && !rcu_is_callbacks_kthread())))
 				break;
+
+			/*
+			 * Make sure we don't spend too much time here and deprive other
+			 * softirq vectors of CPU cycles.
+			 */
+			if (unlikely(tlimit)) {
+				/* only call local_clock() every 32 callbacks */
+				if (likely((-rcl.len & 31) || local_clock() < tlimit))
+					continue;
+				/* Exceeded the time limit, so leave. */
+				break;
+			}
 		} else {
 			local_bh_enable();
 			lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
@@ -2501,18 +2513,6 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data *rdp)
 			lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
 			local_bh_disable();
 		}
-
-		/*
-		 * Make sure we don't spend too much time here and deprive other
-		 * softirq vectors of CPU cycles.
-		 */
-		if (unlikely(tlimit)) {
-			/* only call local_clock() every 32 callbacks */
-			if (likely((-rcl.len & 31) || local_clock() < tlimit))
-				continue;
-			/* Exceeded the time limit, so leave. */
-			break;
-		}
 	}
 
 	local_irq_save(flags);
-- 
2.30.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-02 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-02 19:08 [PATCH 0/2] RCU offloading vs scheduler latency Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2022-05-02 19:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] rcu: Fix callbacks processing time limit retaining cond_resched() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2022-05-02 19:08 ` Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) [this message]
2022-05-02 19:28 ` [PATCH 0/2] RCU offloading vs scheduler latency Greg KH
2022-05-03  9:19   ` Uladzislau Rezki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220502190833.3352-3-urezki@gmail.com \
    --to=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox