public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tianchen Ding <dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 3/3] selftests: bpf: Don't run sk_lookup in verifier tests
Date: Mon,  1 Aug 2022 15:29:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220801072916.29586-4-dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220801072916.29586-1-dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com>

From: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>

commit b4f894633fa14d7d46ba7676f950b90a401504bb upstream.

sk_lookup doesn't allow setting data_in for bpf_prog_run. This doesn't
play well with the verifier tests, since they always set a 64 byte
input buffer. Allow not running verifier tests by setting
bpf_test.runs to a negative value and don't run the ctx access case
for sk_lookup. We have dedicated ctx access tests so skipping here
doesn't reduce coverage.

Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210303101816.36774-6-lmb@cloudflare.com
Signed-off-by: Tianchen Ding <dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c          | 4 ++--
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index a4c55fcb0e7b..0fb92d9a319b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ struct bpf_test {
 	enum bpf_prog_type prog_type;
 	uint8_t flags;
 	void (*fill_helper)(struct bpf_test *self);
-	uint8_t runs;
+	int runs;
 #define bpf_testdata_struct_t					\
 	struct {						\
 		uint32_t retval, retval_unpriv;			\
@@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
 
 	run_errs = 0;
 	run_successes = 0;
-	if (!alignment_prevented_execution && fd_prog >= 0) {
+	if (!alignment_prevented_execution && fd_prog >= 0 && test->runs >= 0) {
 		uint32_t expected_val;
 		int i;
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c
index 2ad5f974451c..fd3b62a084b9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c
@@ -239,6 +239,7 @@
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
 	.expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+	.runs = -1,
 },
 /* invalid 8-byte reads from a 4-byte fields in bpf_sk_lookup */
 {
-- 
2.27.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-01  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-01  7:29 [PATCH 5.10 0/3] fix build error in bpf selftests Tianchen Ding
2022-08-01  7:29 ` [PATCH 5.10 1/3] bpf: Consolidate shared test timing code Tianchen Ding
2022-08-01  7:29 ` [PATCH 5.10 2/3] bpf: Add PROG_TEST_RUN support for sk_lookup programs Tianchen Ding
2022-08-01  7:29 ` Tianchen Ding [this message]
2022-08-01  8:51 ` [PATCH 5.10 0/3] fix build error in bpf selftests Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220801072916.29586-4-dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lmb@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox