From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Max Schulze <max.schulze@online.de>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.19 1/7] Revert "mm: kfence: apply kmemleak_ignore_phys on early allocated pool"
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 17:39:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220819153711.621086880@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220819153711.552247994@linuxfoundation.org>
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
This reverts commit 07313a2b29ed1079eaa7722624544b97b3ead84b.
Commit 0c24e061196c21d5 ("mm: kmemleak: add rbtree and store physical
address for objects allocated with PA") is not yet in 5.19 (but appears
in 6.0). Without 0c24e061196c21d5, kmemleak still stores phys objects
and non-phys objects in the same tree, and ignoring (instead of freeing)
will cause insertions into the kmemleak object tree by the slab
post-alloc hook to conflict with the pool object (see comment).
Reports such as the following would appear on boot, and effectively
disable kmemleak:
| kmemleak: Cannot insert 0xffffff806e24f000 into the object search tree (overlaps existing)
| CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.19.0-v8-0815+ #5
| Hardware name: Raspberry Pi Compute Module 4 Rev 1.0 (DT)
| Call trace:
| dump_backtrace.part.0+0x1dc/0x1ec
| show_stack+0x24/0x80
| dump_stack_lvl+0x8c/0xb8
| dump_stack+0x1c/0x38
| create_object.isra.0+0x490/0x4b0
| kmemleak_alloc+0x3c/0x50
| kmem_cache_alloc+0x2f8/0x450
| __proc_create+0x18c/0x400
| proc_create_reg+0x54/0xd0
| proc_create_seq_private+0x94/0x120
| init_mm_internals+0x1d8/0x248
| kernel_init_freeable+0x188/0x388
| kernel_init+0x30/0x150
| ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
| kmemleak: Kernel memory leak detector disabled
| kmemleak: Object 0xffffff806e24d000 (size 2097152):
| kmemleak: comm "swapper", pid 0, jiffies 4294892296
| kmemleak: min_count = -1
| kmemleak: count = 0
| kmemleak: flags = 0x5
| kmemleak: checksum = 0
| kmemleak: backtrace:
| kmemleak_alloc_phys+0x94/0xb0
| memblock_alloc_range_nid+0x1c0/0x20c
| memblock_alloc_internal+0x88/0x100
| memblock_alloc_try_nid+0x148/0x1ac
| kfence_alloc_pool+0x44/0x6c
| mm_init+0x28/0x98
| start_kernel+0x178/0x3e8
| __primary_switched+0xc4/0xcc
Reported-by: Max Schulze <max.schulze@online.de>
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/b33b33bc-2d06-1bcd-2df7-43678962b728@online.de/
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
mm/kfence/core.c | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/kfence/core.c
+++ b/mm/kfence/core.c
@@ -603,6 +603,14 @@ static unsigned long kfence_init_pool(vo
addr += 2 * PAGE_SIZE;
}
+ /*
+ * The pool is live and will never be deallocated from this point on.
+ * Remove the pool object from the kmemleak object tree, as it would
+ * otherwise overlap with allocations returned by kfence_alloc(), which
+ * are registered with kmemleak through the slab post-alloc hook.
+ */
+ kmemleak_free(__kfence_pool);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -615,16 +623,8 @@ static bool __init kfence_init_pool_earl
addr = kfence_init_pool();
- if (!addr) {
- /*
- * The pool is live and will never be deallocated from this point on.
- * Ignore the pool object from the kmemleak phys object tree, as it would
- * otherwise overlap with allocations returned by kfence_alloc(), which
- * are registered with kmemleak through the slab post-alloc hook.
- */
- kmemleak_ignore_phys(__pa(__kfence_pool));
+ if (!addr)
return true;
- }
/*
* Only release unprotected pages, and do not try to go back and change
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-19 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-19 15:39 [PATCH 5.19 0/7] 5.19.3-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-19 15:39 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2022-08-19 15:39 ` [PATCH 5.19 2/7] tee: add overflow check in register_shm_helper() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-19 15:39 ` [PATCH 5.19 3/7] net_sched: cls_route: disallow handle of 0 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-19 15:39 ` [PATCH 5.19 4/7] btrfs: only write the sectors in the vertical stripe which has data stripes Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-19 15:39 ` [PATCH 5.19 5/7] btrfs: raid56: dont trust any cached sector in __raid56_parity_recover() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-19 15:39 ` [PATCH 5.19 6/7] kexec, KEYS: make the code in bzImage64_verify_sig generic Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-19 15:39 ` [PATCH 5.19 7/7] arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-20 0:22 ` [PATCH 5.19 0/7] 5.19.3-rc1 review Zan Aziz
2022-08-20 0:39 ` Shuah Khan
2022-08-20 0:40 ` Ron Economos
2022-08-20 8:04 ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-08-20 9:53 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
2022-08-20 10:06 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-08-21 0:54 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220819153711.621086880@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=max.schulze@online.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox