From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: david@redhat.com, gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com,
gor@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4.9] s390/mm: do not trigger write fault when vma does not allow VM_WRITE
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 17:52:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220829155238.3865621-1-gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16617586646999@kroah.com>
commit 41ac42f137080bc230b5882e3c88c392ab7f2d32 upstream.
For non-protection pXd_none() page faults in do_dat_exception(), we
call do_exception() with access == (VM_READ | VM_WRITE | VM_EXEC).
In do_exception(), vma->vm_flags is checked against that before
calling handle_mm_fault().
Since commit 92f842eac7ee3 ("[S390] store indication fault optimization"),
we call handle_mm_fault() with FAULT_FLAG_WRITE, when recognizing that
it was a write access. However, the vma flags check is still only
checking against (VM_READ | VM_WRITE | VM_EXEC), and therefore also
calling handle_mm_fault() with FAULT_FLAG_WRITE in cases where the vma
does not allow VM_WRITE.
Fix this by changing access check in do_exception() to VM_WRITE only,
when recognizing write access.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220811103435.188481-3-david@redhat.com
Fixes: 92f842eac7ee3 ("[S390] store indication fault optimization")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Reported-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/mm/fault.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
index ba2f21873cbd..6fa4220e34b5 100644
--- a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
@@ -409,7 +409,9 @@ static inline int do_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int access)
flags = FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY | FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE;
if (user_mode(regs))
flags |= FAULT_FLAG_USER;
- if (access == VM_WRITE || (trans_exc_code & store_indication) == 0x400)
+ if ((trans_exc_code & store_indication) == 0x400)
+ access = VM_WRITE;
+ if (access == VM_WRITE)
flags |= FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-29 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-29 7:37 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] s390/mm: do not trigger write fault when vma does not allow" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree gregkh
2022-08-29 15:52 ` Gerald Schaefer [this message]
2022-09-01 10:12 ` [PATCH 4.9] s390/mm: do not trigger write fault when vma does not allow VM_WRITE Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220829155238.3865621-1-gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--to=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox