stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rishabh Bhatnagar <risbhat@amazon.com>
To: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <surajjs@amazon.com>,
	<mbacco@amazon.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Rishabh Bhatnagar <risbhat@amazon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 9/9] KVM: x86: move guest_pv_has out of user_access section
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2022 18:13:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220909181351.23983-10-risbhat@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220909181351.23983-1-risbhat@amazon.com>

From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

commit 3e067fd8503d6205aa0c1c8f48f6b209c592d19c upstream.

When UBSAN is enabled, the code emitted for the call to guest_pv_has
includes a call to __ubsan_handle_load_invalid_value.  objtool
complains that this call happens with UACCESS enabled; to avoid
the warning, pull the calls to user_access_begin into both arms
of the "if" statement, after the check for guest_pv_has.

Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rishabh Bhatnagar <risbhat@amazon.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 9e9298c333c8..e3599a51c72d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -3042,9 +3042,6 @@ static void record_steal_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	}
 
 	st = (struct kvm_steal_time __user *)ghc->hva;
-	if (!user_access_begin(st, sizeof(*st)))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * Doing a TLB flush here, on the guest's behalf, can avoid
 	 * expensive IPIs.
@@ -3053,6 +3050,9 @@ static void record_steal_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		u8 st_preempted = 0;
 		int err = -EFAULT;
 
+		if (!user_access_begin(st, sizeof(*st)))
+			return;
+
 		asm volatile("1: xchgb %0, %2\n"
 			     "xor %1, %1\n"
 			     "2:\n"
@@ -3075,6 +3075,9 @@ static void record_steal_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		if (!user_access_begin(st, sizeof(*st)))
 			goto dirty;
 	} else {
+		if (!user_access_begin(st, sizeof(*st)))
+			return;
+
 		unsafe_put_user(0, &st->preempted, out);
 		vcpu->arch.st.preempted = 0;
 	}
-- 
2.37.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-09 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-09 18:13 [PATCH 0/9] KVM backports to 5.10 Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:13 ` [PATCH 1/9] KVM: x86: Ensure PV TLB flush tracepoint reflects KVM behavior Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:13 ` [PATCH 2/9] KVM: x86: Fix recording of guest steal time / preempted status Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:13 ` [PATCH 3/9] KVM: Fix steal time asm constraints Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:13 ` [PATCH 4/9] KVM: x86: Remove obsolete disabling of page faults in kvm_arch_vcpu_put() Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:13 ` [PATCH 5/9] KVM: x86: do not set st->preempted when going back to user space Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:13 ` [PATCH 6/9] KVM: x86: do not report a vCPU as preempted outside instruction boundaries Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:13 ` [PATCH 7/9] KVM: x86: revalidate steal time cache if MSR value changes Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:13 ` [PATCH 8/9] KVM: x86: do not report preemption if the steal time cache is stale Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:13 ` Rishabh Bhatnagar [this message]
2022-09-09 18:26 ` [PATCH 0/9] KVM backports to 5.10 Greg KH
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-09-09 18:55 Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:55 ` [PATCH 9/9] KVM: x86: move guest_pv_has out of user_access section Rishabh Bhatnagar
2023-05-10 18:15 [PATCH 0/9] KVM backports to 5.10 Rishabh Bhatnagar
2023-05-10 18:15 ` [PATCH 9/9] KVM: x86: move guest_pv_has out of user_access section Rishabh Bhatnagar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220909181351.23983-10-risbhat@amazon.com \
    --to=risbhat@amazon.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=mbacco@amazon.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=surajjs@amazon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).