From: Rishabh Bhatnagar <risbhat@amazon.com>
To: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <surajjs@amazon.com>,
<mbacco@amazon.com>, <bp@alien8.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<tglx@linutronix.de>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <seanjc@google.com>,
<vkuznets@redhat.com>, <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
<jmattson@google.com>, <joro@8bytes.org>,
"Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Rishabh Bhatnagar <risbhat@amazon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 9/9] KVM: x86: move guest_pv_has out of user_access section
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2022 18:55:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220909185557.21255-10-risbhat@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220909185557.21255-1-risbhat@amazon.com>
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
commit 3e067fd8503d6205aa0c1c8f48f6b209c592d19c upstream.
When UBSAN is enabled, the code emitted for the call to guest_pv_has
includes a call to __ubsan_handle_load_invalid_value. objtool
complains that this call happens with UACCESS enabled; to avoid
the warning, pull the calls to user_access_begin into both arms
of the "if" statement, after the check for guest_pv_has.
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rishabh Bhatnagar <risbhat@amazon.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 9e9298c333c8..e3599a51c72d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -3042,9 +3042,6 @@ static void record_steal_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
}
st = (struct kvm_steal_time __user *)ghc->hva;
- if (!user_access_begin(st, sizeof(*st)))
- return;
-
/*
* Doing a TLB flush here, on the guest's behalf, can avoid
* expensive IPIs.
@@ -3053,6 +3050,9 @@ static void record_steal_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
u8 st_preempted = 0;
int err = -EFAULT;
+ if (!user_access_begin(st, sizeof(*st)))
+ return;
+
asm volatile("1: xchgb %0, %2\n"
"xor %1, %1\n"
"2:\n"
@@ -3075,6 +3075,9 @@ static void record_steal_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (!user_access_begin(st, sizeof(*st)))
goto dirty;
} else {
+ if (!user_access_begin(st, sizeof(*st)))
+ return;
+
unsafe_put_user(0, &st->preempted, out);
vcpu->arch.st.preempted = 0;
}
--
2.37.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-09 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-09 18:55 [PATCH 0/9] KVM backports to 5.10 Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:55 ` [PATCH 1/9] KVM: x86: Ensure PV TLB flush tracepoint reflects KVM behavior Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:55 ` [PATCH 2/9] KVM: x86: Fix recording of guest steal time / preempted status Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:55 ` [PATCH 3/9] KVM: Fix steal time asm constraints Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:55 ` [PATCH 4/9] KVM: x86: Remove obsolete disabling of page faults in kvm_arch_vcpu_put() Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:55 ` [PATCH 5/9] KVM: x86: do not set st->preempted when going back to user space Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:55 ` [PATCH 6/9] KVM: x86: do not report a vCPU as preempted outside instruction boundaries Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:55 ` [PATCH 7/9] KVM: x86: revalidate steal time cache if MSR value changes Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:55 ` [PATCH 8/9] KVM: x86: do not report preemption if the steal time cache is stale Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:55 ` Rishabh Bhatnagar [this message]
2022-09-20 15:34 ` [PATCH 0/9] KVM backports to 5.10 Bhatnagar, Rishabh
2022-09-20 16:19 ` gregkh
2022-09-21 8:58 ` gregkh
2023-04-19 7:17 ` Lee Jones
2023-05-02 20:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-03 7:34 ` Lee Jones
2023-05-04 1:10 ` gregkh
2023-05-04 16:22 ` Bhatnagar, Rishabh
2023-05-10 13:43 ` Lee Jones
2023-05-03 17:10 ` Allen Pais
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-05-10 18:15 Rishabh Bhatnagar
2023-05-10 18:15 ` [PATCH 9/9] KVM: x86: move guest_pv_has out of user_access section Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:13 [PATCH 0/9] KVM backports to 5.10 Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:13 ` [PATCH 9/9] KVM: x86: move guest_pv_has out of user_access section Rishabh Bhatnagar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220909185557.21255-10-risbhat@amazon.com \
--to=risbhat@amazon.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=mbacco@amazon.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surajjs@amazon.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).