From: Rishabh Bhatnagar <risbhat@amazon.com>
To: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <surajjs@amazon.com>,
<mbacco@amazon.com>, <bp@alien8.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<tglx@linutronix.de>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <seanjc@google.com>,
<vkuznets@redhat.com>, <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
<jmattson@google.com>, <joro@8bytes.org>,
"David Woodhouse" <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
"Rishabh Bhatnagar" <risbhat@amazon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/9] KVM: Fix steal time asm constraints
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2022 18:55:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220909185557.21255-4-risbhat@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220909185557.21255-1-risbhat@amazon.com>
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
commit 964b7aa0b040bdc6ec1c543ee620cda3f8b4c68a upstream.
In 64-bit mode, x86 instruction encoding allows us to use the low 8 bits
of any GPR as an 8-bit operand. In 32-bit mode, however, we can only use
the [abcd] registers. For which, GCC has the "q" constraint instead of
the less restrictive "r".
Also fix st->preempted, which is an input/output operand rather than an
input.
Fixes: 7e2175ebd695 ("KVM: x86: Fix recording of guest steal time / preempted status")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Message-Id: <89bf72db1b859990355f9c40713a34e0d2d86c98.camel@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rishabh Bhatnagar <risbhat@amazon.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index cd1e6710bc33..3de3dcb27f7b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -3055,9 +3055,9 @@ static void record_steal_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
"xor %1, %1\n"
"2:\n"
_ASM_EXTABLE_UA(1b, 2b)
- : "+r" (st_preempted),
- "+&r" (err)
- : "m" (st->preempted));
+ : "+q" (st_preempted),
+ "+&r" (err),
+ "+m" (st->preempted));
if (err)
goto out;
--
2.37.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-09 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-09 18:55 [PATCH 0/9] KVM backports to 5.10 Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:55 ` [PATCH 1/9] KVM: x86: Ensure PV TLB flush tracepoint reflects KVM behavior Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:55 ` [PATCH 2/9] KVM: x86: Fix recording of guest steal time / preempted status Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:55 ` Rishabh Bhatnagar [this message]
2022-09-09 18:55 ` [PATCH 4/9] KVM: x86: Remove obsolete disabling of page faults in kvm_arch_vcpu_put() Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:55 ` [PATCH 5/9] KVM: x86: do not set st->preempted when going back to user space Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:55 ` [PATCH 6/9] KVM: x86: do not report a vCPU as preempted outside instruction boundaries Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:55 ` [PATCH 7/9] KVM: x86: revalidate steal time cache if MSR value changes Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:55 ` [PATCH 8/9] KVM: x86: do not report preemption if the steal time cache is stale Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:55 ` [PATCH 9/9] KVM: x86: move guest_pv_has out of user_access section Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-20 15:34 ` [PATCH 0/9] KVM backports to 5.10 Bhatnagar, Rishabh
2022-09-20 16:19 ` gregkh
2022-09-21 8:58 ` gregkh
2023-04-19 7:17 ` Lee Jones
2023-05-02 20:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-03 7:34 ` Lee Jones
2023-05-04 1:10 ` gregkh
2023-05-04 16:22 ` Bhatnagar, Rishabh
2023-05-10 13:43 ` Lee Jones
2023-05-03 17:10 ` Allen Pais
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-05-10 18:15 Rishabh Bhatnagar
2023-05-10 18:15 ` [PATCH 3/9] KVM: Fix steal time asm constraints Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:13 [PATCH 0/9] KVM backports to 5.10 Rishabh Bhatnagar
2022-09-09 18:13 ` [PATCH 3/9] KVM: Fix steal time asm constraints Rishabh Bhatnagar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220909185557.21255-4-risbhat@amazon.com \
--to=risbhat@amazon.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mbacco@amazon.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surajjs@amazon.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).