public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suraj Jitindar Singh <surajjs@amazon.com>
To: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <surajjs@amazon.com>, <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	<tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <bp@suse.de>,
	<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <seanjc@google.com>,
	<pbonzini@redhat.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
	<jpoimboe@kernel.org>, <daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com>,
	<pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>, <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	<stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/speculation: Mitigate eIBRS PBRSB predictions with WRMSR
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 15:02:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221005220227.1959-1-surajjs@amazon.com> (raw)

tl;dr: The existing mitigation for eIBRS PBRSB predictions uses an INT3 to
ensure a call instruction retires before a following unbalanced RET. Replace
this with a WRMSR serialising instruction which has a lower performance
penalty.

== Background ==

eIBRS (enhanced indirect branch restricted speculation) is used to prevent
predictor addresses from one privilege domain from being used for prediction
in a higher privilege domain.

== Problem ==

On processors with eIBRS protections there can be a case where upon VM exit
a guest address may be used as an RSB prediction for an unbalanced RET if a
CALL instruction hasn't yet been retired. This is termed PBRSB (Post-Barrier
Return Stack Buffer).

A mitigation for this was introduced in:
(2b1299322016731d56807aa49254a5ea3080b6b3 x86/speculation: Add RSB VM Exit protections)

This mitigation [1] has a ~1% performance impact on VM exit compared to without
it [2].

== Solution ==

The WRMSR instruction can be used as a speculation barrier and a serialising
instruction. Use this on the VM exit path instead to ensure that a CALL
instruction (in this case the call to vmx_spec_ctrl_restore_host) has retired
before the prediction of a following unbalanced RET.

This mitigation [3] has a negligible performance impact.

== Testing ==

Run the outl_to_kernel kvm-unit-tests test 200 times per configuration which
counts the cycles for an exit to kernel mode.

[1] With existing mitigation:
Average: 2026 cycles
[2] With no mitigation:
Average: 2008 cycles
[3] With proposed mitigation:
Average: 2008 cycles

Signed-off-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <surajjs@amazon.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h | 7 +++----
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S           | 3 +--
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c               | 5 +++++
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
index c936ce9f0c47..e5723e024b47 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
@@ -159,10 +159,9 @@
   * A simpler FILL_RETURN_BUFFER macro. Don't make people use the CPP
   * monstrosity above, manually.
   */
-.macro FILL_RETURN_BUFFER reg:req nr:req ftr:req ftr2=ALT_NOT(X86_FEATURE_ALWAYS)
-	ALTERNATIVE_2 "jmp .Lskip_rsb_\@", \
-		__stringify(__FILL_RETURN_BUFFER(\reg,\nr)), \ftr, \
-		__stringify(__FILL_ONE_RETURN), \ftr2
+.macro FILL_RETURN_BUFFER reg:req nr:req ftr:req
+	ALTERNATIVE "jmp .Lskip_rsb_\@", \
+		__stringify(__FILL_RETURN_BUFFER(\reg,\nr)), \ftr
 
 .Lskip_rsb_\@:
 .endm
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S
index 6de96b943804..eb82797bd7bf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S
@@ -231,8 +231,7 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(vmx_vmexit, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
 	 * single call to retire, before the first unbalanced RET.
          */
 
-	FILL_RETURN_BUFFER %_ASM_CX, RSB_CLEAR_LOOPS, X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT,\
-			   X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT_LITE
+	FILL_RETURN_BUFFER %_ASM_CX, RSB_CLEAR_LOOPS, X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT
 
 
 	pop %_ASM_ARG2	/* @flags */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index c9b49a09e6b5..fdcd8e10c2ab 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -7049,8 +7049,13 @@ void noinstr vmx_spec_ctrl_restore_host(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx,
 	 * For legacy IBRS, the IBRS bit always needs to be written after
 	 * transitioning from a less privileged predictor mode, regardless of
 	 * whether the guest/host values differ.
+	 *
+	 * For eIBRS affected by Post Barrier RSB Predictions a serialising
+	 * instruction (wrmsr) must be executed to ensure a call instruction has
+	 * retired before the prediction of a following unbalanced ret.
 	 */
 	if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_KERNEL_IBRS) ||
+	    cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT_LITE) ||
 	    vmx->spec_ctrl != hostval)
 		native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, hostval);
 
-- 
2.17.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-10-05 22:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-05 22:02 Suraj Jitindar Singh [this message]
2022-10-05 22:29 ` [PATCH] x86/speculation: Mitigate eIBRS PBRSB predictions with WRMSR Jim Mattson
2022-10-06  8:25   ` David Laight
2022-10-06 20:27     ` pawan.kumar.gupta
2022-10-05 23:24 ` Jim Mattson
2022-10-05 23:45   ` Pawan Gupta
2022-10-05 23:46 ` Jim Mattson
2022-10-06  0:26   ` Daniel Sneddon
2022-10-06  1:28     ` Jim Mattson
2022-10-06  8:18   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-06  2:42 ` Andrew Cooper
2022-10-07  1:44   ` pawan.kumar.gupta
2022-10-07  1:54 ` Pawan Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221005220227.1959-1-surajjs@amazon.com \
    --to=surajjs@amazon.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=sjitindarsingh@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox