From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com>
Cc: "Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Tomasz Moń" <tomasz.mon@camlingroup.com>,
"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
"Sasha Levin" <sashal@kernel.org>,
torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Han Xu" <han.xu@nxp.com>, kernel <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"k drobinski" <k.drobinski@camlintechnologies.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: gpmi: Set WAIT_FOR_READY timeout based on program/erase times
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 10:01:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221024100114.627f87bd@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ+vNU0r3Enkwn+WzvEJYc_O4NurRyCssx2S-_ZS_cYCpk2-cA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Tim,
tharvey@gateworks.com wrote on Fri, 21 Oct 2022 14:55:15 -0700:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 12:03 AM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > richard@nod.at wrote on Fri, 15 Jul 2022 09:59:10 +0200 (CEST):
> >
> > > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > > >> My IRC history doesn't go back far enough, but if I recall correctly
> > > >> Miquel is on vacation, he would have picked up this patch for linux-next
> > > >> otherwise.
> > >
> > > Exactly.
> >
> > Indeed, I was off for an extended period of time, I'm (very) slowly
> > catching up now.
> >
> > >
> > > > Ok, let me do a round of stable releases so that people don't get hit by
> > > > this now...
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot for doing so.
> > >
> > > > Hopefully this gets fixed up by 5.19-final.
> > >
> > > Sure, I'll pickup this patch.
> >
> > Thanks Greg & Richard for the handling of this issue.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Miquèl
> >
>
> Hello All,
>
> As Tomasz stated previously 06781a5026350 was merged in v5.19-rc4 and
> then was picked up by several stable kernels. While this made it into
> the 5.15 and 5.18 stable branches it did not make it into the
> following which are thus the are currently broken:
> 5.10.y
> 5.17.y
>
> How do we get this patch applied to those stable branches as well to
> resolve this?
It is likely that the original patch (targeting a mainline kernel) did
not apply to those branches. In this case you can adapt the fix to the
concerned kernels and send it to stable@ (following the Documentation
guidelines for backports).
Thanks,
Miquèl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-24 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-01 11:03 [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: gpmi: Set WAIT_FOR_READY timeout based on program/erase times Sascha Hauer
2022-07-01 12:53 ` Han Xu
2022-07-11 9:12 ` Tomasz Moń
2022-07-15 5:27 ` Tomasz Moń
2022-07-15 5:49 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-07-15 7:46 ` Sascha Hauer
2022-07-15 7:54 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-07-15 7:54 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-07-15 7:59 ` Richard Weinberger
2022-09-02 7:02 ` Miquel Raynal
2022-10-21 21:55 ` Tim Harvey
2022-10-22 0:37 ` Tim Harvey
2022-10-24 8:01 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2022-10-25 22:02 ` Tim Harvey
2022-10-26 8:18 ` Miquel Raynal
2022-10-26 10:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221024100114.627f87bd@xps-13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=han.xu@nxp.com \
--cc=k.drobinski@camlintechnologies.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tharvey@gateworks.com \
--cc=tomasz.mon@camlingroup.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).