From: Suraj Jitindar Singh <surajjs@amazon.com>
To: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <surajjs@amazon.com>, <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com>,
<cascardo@canonical.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<pbonzini@redhat.com>, <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
<peterz@infradead.org>, <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 06/34] x86/cpu: Add a steppings field to struct x86_cpu_id
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 13:54:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221027205442.17210-2-surajjs@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221027205442.17210-1-surajjs@amazon.com>
From: Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>
commit e9d7144597b10ff13ff2264c059f7d4a7fbc89ac upstream
Intel uses the same family/model for several CPUs. Sometimes the
stepping must be checked to tell them apart.
On x86 there can be at most 16 steppings. Add a steppings bitmask to
x86_cpu_id and a X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAMILY_MODEL_STEPPING_FEATURE macro
and support for matching against family/model/stepping.
[ bp: Massage.
tglx: Lightweight variant for backporting ]
Signed-off-by: Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/match.c | 7 ++++++-
include/linux/mod_devicetable.h | 6 ++++++
3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h
index f11770fac73a..e54babe529c7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h
@@ -168,6 +168,33 @@ struct x86_cpu_desc {
.x86_microcode_rev = (revision), \
}
+#define X86_STEPPINGS(mins, maxs) GENMASK(maxs, mins)
+
+/**
+ * X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_STEPPINGS_FEATURE - Base macro for CPU matching
+ * @_vendor: The vendor name, e.g. INTEL, AMD, HYGON, ..., ANY
+ * The name is expanded to X86_VENDOR_@_vendor
+ * @_family: The family number or X86_FAMILY_ANY
+ * @_model: The model number, model constant or X86_MODEL_ANY
+ * @_steppings: Bitmask for steppings, stepping constant or X86_STEPPING_ANY
+ * @_feature: A X86_FEATURE bit or X86_FEATURE_ANY
+ * @_data: Driver specific data or NULL. The internal storage
+ * format is unsigned long. The supplied value, pointer
+ * etc. is casted to unsigned long internally.
+ *
+ * Backport version to keep the SRBDS pile consistant. No shorter variants
+ * required for this.
+ */
+#define X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_STEPPINGS_FEATURE(_vendor, _family, _model, \
+ _steppings, _feature, _data) { \
+ .vendor = X86_VENDOR_##_vendor, \
+ .family = _family, \
+ .model = _model, \
+ .steppings = _steppings, \
+ .feature = _feature, \
+ .driver_data = (unsigned long) _data \
+}
+
extern const struct x86_cpu_id *x86_match_cpu(const struct x86_cpu_id *match);
extern bool x86_cpu_has_min_microcode_rev(const struct x86_cpu_desc *table);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/match.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/match.c
index d3482eb43ff3..ad6776081e60 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/match.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/match.c
@@ -39,13 +39,18 @@ const struct x86_cpu_id *x86_match_cpu(const struct x86_cpu_id *match)
const struct x86_cpu_id *m;
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &boot_cpu_data;
- for (m = match; m->vendor | m->family | m->model | m->feature; m++) {
+ for (m = match;
+ m->vendor | m->family | m->model | m->steppings | m->feature;
+ m++) {
if (m->vendor != X86_VENDOR_ANY && c->x86_vendor != m->vendor)
continue;
if (m->family != X86_FAMILY_ANY && c->x86 != m->family)
continue;
if (m->model != X86_MODEL_ANY && c->x86_model != m->model)
continue;
+ if (m->steppings != X86_STEPPING_ANY &&
+ !(BIT(c->x86_stepping) & m->steppings))
+ continue;
if (m->feature != X86_FEATURE_ANY && !cpu_has(c, m->feature))
continue;
return m;
diff --git a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
index e57cd43989fe..97794823eabd 100644
--- a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
+++ b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
@@ -589,6 +589,10 @@ struct mips_cdmm_device_id {
/*
* MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE expects this struct to be called x86cpu_device_id.
* Although gcc seems to ignore this error, clang fails without this define.
+ *
+ * Note: The ordering of the struct is different from upstream because the
+ * static initializers in kernels < 5.7 still use C89 style while upstream
+ * has been converted to proper C99 initializers.
*/
#define x86cpu_device_id x86_cpu_id
struct x86_cpu_id {
@@ -597,12 +601,14 @@ struct x86_cpu_id {
__u16 model;
__u16 feature; /* bit index */
kernel_ulong_t driver_data;
+ __u16 steppings;
};
/* Wild cards for x86_cpu_id::vendor, family, model and feature */
#define X86_VENDOR_ANY 0xffff
#define X86_FAMILY_ANY 0
#define X86_MODEL_ANY 0
+#define X86_STEPPING_ANY 0
#define X86_FEATURE_ANY 0 /* Same as FPU, you can't test for that */
/*
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-27 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-27 20:48 [PATCH 4.14 00/34] Retbleed & PBRSB Mitigations Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:54 ` [PATCH 4.14 01/34] Revert "x86/cpu: Add a steppings field to struct x86_cpu_id" Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:54 ` [PATCH 4.14 02/34] x86/cpufeature: Add facility to check for min microcode revisions Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:54 ` [PATCH 4.14 03/34] x86/cpufeature: Fix various quality problems in the <asm/cpu_device_hd.h> header Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:54 ` [PATCH 4.14 04/34] x86/devicetable: Move x86 specific macro out of generic code Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:54 ` [PATCH 4.14 05/34] x86/cpu: Add consistent CPU match macros Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:54 ` Suraj Jitindar Singh [this message]
2022-10-27 20:54 ` [PATCH 4.14 07/34] x86/entry: Remove skip_r11rcx Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:54 ` [PATCH 4.14 08/34] x86/cpufeatures: Move RETPOLINE flags to word 11 Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:54 ` [PATCH 4.14 09/34] x86/bugs: Report AMD retbleed vulnerability Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:54 ` [PATCH 4.14 10/34] x86/bugs: Add AMD retbleed= boot parameter Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:54 ` [PATCH 4.14 11/34] x86/bugs: Keep a per-CPU IA32_SPEC_CTRL value Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:54 ` [PATCH 4.14 12/34] x86/entry: Add kernel IBRS implementation Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:54 ` [PATCH 4.14 13/34] x86/bugs: Optimize SPEC_CTRL MSR writes Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:55 ` [PATCH 4.14 14/34] x86/speculation: Add spectre_v2=ibrs option to support Kernel IBRS Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:55 ` [PATCH 4.14 15/34] x86/bugs: Split spectre_v2_select_mitigation() and spectre_v2_user_select_mitigation() Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:55 ` [PATCH 4.14 16/34] x86/bugs: Report Intel retbleed vulnerability Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:55 ` [PATCH 4.14 17/34] entel_idle: Disable IBRS during long idle Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:55 ` [PATCH 4.14 18/34] x86/speculation: Change FILL_RETURN_BUFFER to work with objtool Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:55 ` [PATCH 4.14 19/34] x86/speculation: Add LFENCE to RSB fill sequence Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:55 ` [PATCH 4.14 20/34] x86/speculation: Fix RSB filling with CONFIG_RETPOLINE=n Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:55 ` [PATCH 4.14 21/34] x86/speculation: Fix firmware entry SPEC_CTRL handling Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:55 ` [PATCH 4.14 22/34] x86/speculation: Fix SPEC_CTRL write on SMT state change Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:55 ` [PATCH 4.14 23/34] x86/speculation: Use cached host SPEC_CTRL value for guest entry/exit Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:55 ` [PATCH 4.14 24/34] x86/speculation: Remove x86_spec_ctrl_mask Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:55 ` [PATCH 4.14 25/34] KVM: VMX: Prevent guest RSB poisoning attacks with eIBRS Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:55 ` [PATCH 4.14 26/34] KVM: VMX: Fix IBRS handling after vmexit Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:55 ` [PATCH 4.14 27/34] x86/speculation: Fill RSB on vmexit for IBRS Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:55 ` [PATCH 4.14 28/34] x86/common: Stamp out the stepping madness Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:55 ` [PATCH 4.14 29/34] x86/cpu/amd: Enumerate BTC_NO Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:55 ` [PATCH 4.14 30/34] x86/bugs: Add Cannon lake to RETBleed affected CPU list Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:55 ` [PATCH 4.14 31/34] x86/speculation: Disable RRSBA behavior Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:55 ` [PATCH 4.14 32/34] x86/speculation: Use DECLARE_PER_CPU for x86_spec_ctrl_current Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:56 ` [PATCH 4.14 33/34] x86/bugs: Warn when "ibrs" mitigation is selected on Enhanced IBRS parts Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-27 20:56 ` [PATCH 4.14 34/34] x86/speculation: Add RSB VM Exit protections Suraj Jitindar Singh
2022-10-31 7:00 ` [PATCH 4.14 00/34] Retbleed & PBRSB Mitigations Greg KH
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-10-31 7:02 [PATCH 4.14 00/34] 4.14.297-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-10-31 7:02 ` [PATCH 4.14 06/34] x86/cpu: Add a steppings field to struct x86_cpu_id Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221027205442.17210-2-surajjs@amazon.com \
--to=surajjs@amazon.com \
--cc=cascardo@canonical.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sjitindarsingh@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox