From: xiubli@redhat.com
To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, jlayton@kernel.org, idryomov@gmail.com
Cc: lhenriques@suse.de, mchangir@redhat.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2 v3] ceph: add ceph_lock_info support for file_lock
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 10:06:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221118020642.472484-3-xiubli@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221118020642.472484-1-xiubli@redhat.com>
From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
When ceph releasing the file_lock it will try to get the inode pointer
from the fl->fl_file, which the memory could already be released by
another thread in filp_close(). Because in VFS layer the fl->fl_file
doesn't increase the file's reference counter.
Will switch to use ceph dedicate lock info to track the inode.
And in ceph_fl_release_lock() we should skip all the operations if
the fl->fl_u.ceph_fl.fl_inode is not set, which should come from
the request file_lock. And we will set fl->fl_u.ceph_fl.fl_inode when
inserting it to the inode lock list, which is when copying the lock.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/57986
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
---
fs/ceph/locks.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
include/linux/ceph/ceph_fs_fl.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
include/linux/fs.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/linux/ceph/ceph_fs_fl.h
diff --git a/fs/ceph/locks.c b/fs/ceph/locks.c
index b191426bf880..621f38f10a88 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/locks.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/locks.c
@@ -34,18 +34,34 @@ static void ceph_fl_copy_lock(struct file_lock *dst, struct file_lock *src)
{
struct inode *inode = file_inode(dst->fl_file);
atomic_inc(&ceph_inode(inode)->i_filelock_ref);
+ dst->fl_u.ceph_fl.fl_inode = igrab(inode);
}
+/*
+ * Do not use the 'fl->fl_file' in release function, which
+ * is possibly already released by another thread.
+ */
static void ceph_fl_release_lock(struct file_lock *fl)
{
- struct inode *inode = file_inode(fl->fl_file);
- struct ceph_inode_info *ci = ceph_inode(inode);
+ struct inode *inode = fl->fl_u.ceph_fl.fl_inode;
+ struct ceph_inode_info *ci;
+
+ /*
+ * If inode is NULL it should be a request file_lock,
+ * nothing we can do.
+ */
+ if (!inode)
+ return;
+
+ ci = ceph_inode(inode);
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ci->i_filelock_ref)) {
/* clear error when all locks are released */
spin_lock(&ci->i_ceph_lock);
ci->i_ceph_flags &= ~CEPH_I_ERROR_FILELOCK;
spin_unlock(&ci->i_ceph_lock);
}
+ fl->fl_u.ceph_fl.fl_inode = NULL;
+ iput(inode);
}
static const struct file_lock_operations ceph_fl_lock_ops = {
diff --git a/include/linux/ceph/ceph_fs_fl.h b/include/linux/ceph/ceph_fs_fl.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ad1cf96329f9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/ceph/ceph_fs_fl.h
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * ceph_fs_fl.h - Ceph lock info
+ *
+ * LGPL2
+ */
+
+#ifndef CEPH_FS_FL_H
+#define CEPH_FS_FL_H
+
+#include <linux/fs.h>
+
+struct ceph_lock_info {
+ struct inode *fl_inode;
+};
+
+#endif
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index d6cb42b7e91c..2b03d5e375d7 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1066,6 +1066,7 @@ bool opens_in_grace(struct net *);
/* that will die - we need it for nfs_lock_info */
#include <linux/nfs_fs_i.h>
+#include <linux/ceph/ceph_fs_fl.h>
/*
* struct file_lock represents a generic "file lock". It's used to represent
@@ -1119,6 +1120,7 @@ struct file_lock {
int state; /* state of grant or error if -ve */
unsigned int debug_id;
} afs;
+ struct ceph_lock_info ceph_fl;
} fl_u;
} __randomize_layout;
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-18 2:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20221118020642.472484-1-xiubli@redhat.com>
2022-11-18 2:06 ` [PATCH 1/2 v3] ceph: switch to vfs_inode_has_locks() to fix file lock bug xiubli
2022-11-18 2:06 ` xiubli [this message]
2022-12-12 17:56 ` [PATCH 2/2 v3] ceph: add ceph_lock_info support for file_lock Ilya Dryomov
2022-12-12 18:02 ` Jeff Layton
2022-12-13 1:25 ` Xiubo Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221118020642.472484-3-xiubli@redhat.com \
--to=xiubli@redhat.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=lhenriques@suse.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchangir@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox