From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A69C4321E for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 11:04:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232572AbiLBLEe (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2022 06:04:34 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49044 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232354AbiLBLEc (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2022 06:04:32 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x52e.google.com (mail-pg1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13717BC5A1 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 03:04:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id s196so4109801pgs.3 for ; Fri, 02 Dec 2022 03:04:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heitbaum.com; s=google; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=D1KXzSfZtuAisNZ05G51clQ324jnx8aq/gsDbzWWu5w=; b=RF10Mb34k2R5dAeYwD2YhiPWcI2Lcs/g4SWXS3huGVHmzpcWS3aJCJjenoi5+J5qNL N3PGDtE7158fXkTpnGTBESokd8cDI4BVGr2BjHh9zxuiC0jIT0ixgMWzN5Cqrgd5aeqd 1zCBIzqITcDuwDjvZ4zN50m/xb9TGNBnSluxE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=D1KXzSfZtuAisNZ05G51clQ324jnx8aq/gsDbzWWu5w=; b=d1M9YxetGQpucZUY/+Nl8FqX/35XfQJPted0RjnjSJicclngt6sFcWt/9/E0RmKCbe kNhwi79LbMQVhfmgmJmIwB3VbY5v7SwmS50OiwskeJ2JE+4mmn1geT/t7I9D1b58vwVt YOpA4VhNcmlDCJapALt7zuoKLLQT9WxHMytXqm6ERI+mayGk9Nz+8Q5XQllDEAHzixv0 sC9r6YegHtwDb4iSVuNN1SEzxXFUH+buR6737bVNQqOVTyGqMfhAIOKYESwPkxt3xFXj hJvvhpWa/G0mSU7opdidV7IQqkInhCTjMJVKugsQqTS5YUENsYCqmm8Ll/jqIQBQma+G UWTA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5plYs27XTwqrKiTyUebTPTVDT4FhYKJbtfMBBb5cJIM8VtWZPEAR jgqLo/Zo4oc16RD7T2ijMCA/ZA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7wTZc+5wt4aeoquiU5DMuMCNEz7aE23amfAwhpaX6SQfiBJKju3DcbsUGJ+ZaHl0jVjFfUGA== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:85c8:0:b0:574:5789:b8a4 with SMTP id z8-20020aa785c8000000b005745789b8a4mr44798364pfn.47.1669979068145; Fri, 02 Dec 2022 03:04:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from d86934a8d1b3 ([220.253.112.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id mm10-20020a17090b358a00b00218f9bd50c7sm4519127pjb.50.2022.12.02.03.04.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 02 Dec 2022 03:04:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 11:04:20 +0000 From: Rudi Heitbaum To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.0 000/280] 6.0.11-rc2 review Message-ID: <20221202110420.GA20583@d86934a8d1b3> References: <20221201131113.897261583@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221201131113.897261583@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 02:11:47PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.11 release. > There are 280 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. Hi Greg, 6.0.11-rc2 tested. Run tested on: - Intel Alder Lake x86_64 (nuc12 i7-1260P) - SolidRun Cubox-i Dual/Quad - NXP iMX6 (Cubox-i4Pro) In addition - build tested for: - Allwinner A64 - Allwinner H3 - Allwinner H5 - Allwinner H6 - NXP iMX8 - Qualcomm Dragonboard - Rockchip RK3288 - Rockchip RK3328 - Rockchip RK3399pro - Samsung Exynos Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum -- Rudi