From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
dave.jiang@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com, rafael@kernel.org,
nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 2/4] ACPI: NFIT: fix a potential deadlock during NFIT teardown
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 15:47:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230215204708.2761432-2-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230215204708.2761432-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
[ Upstream commit fb6df4366f86dd252bfa3049edffa52d17e7b895 ]
Lockdep reports that acpi_nfit_shutdown() may deadlock against an
opportune acpi_nfit_scrub(). acpi_nfit_scrub () is run from inside a
'work' and therefore has already acquired workqueue-internal locks. It
also acquiires acpi_desc->init_mutex. acpi_nfit_shutdown() first
acquires init_mutex, and was subsequently attempting to cancel any
pending workqueue items. This reversed locking order causes a potential
deadlock:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.2.0-rc3 #116 Tainted: G O N
------------------------------------------------------
libndctl/1958 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888129b461c0 ((work_completion)(&(&acpi_desc->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x43/0x450
but task is already holding lock:
ffff888129b460e8 (&acpi_desc->init_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: acpi_nfit_shutdown+0x87/0xd0 [nfit]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&acpi_desc->init_mutex);
lock((work_completion)(&(&acpi_desc->dwork)->work));
lock(&acpi_desc->init_mutex);
lock((work_completion)(&(&acpi_desc->dwork)->work));
*** DEADLOCK ***
Since the workqueue manipulation is protected by its own internal locking,
the cancellation of pending work doesn't need to be done under
acpi_desc->init_mutex. Move cancel_delayed_work_sync() outside the
init_mutex to fix the deadlock. Any work that starts after
acpi_nfit_shutdown() drops the lock will see ARS_CANCEL, and the
cancel_delayed_work_sync() will safely flush it out.
Reported-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230112-acpi_nfit_lockdep-v1-1-660be4dd10be@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
index 58a756ca14d85..c2863eec0f241 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
@@ -3442,8 +3442,8 @@ void acpi_nfit_shutdown(void *data)
mutex_lock(&acpi_desc->init_mutex);
set_bit(ARS_CANCEL, &acpi_desc->scrub_flags);
- cancel_delayed_work_sync(&acpi_desc->dwork);
mutex_unlock(&acpi_desc->init_mutex);
+ cancel_delayed_work_sync(&acpi_desc->dwork);
/*
* Bounce the nvdimm bus lock to make sure any in-flight
--
2.39.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-15 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-15 20:47 [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 1/4] ARM: dts: rockchip: add power-domains property to dp node on rk3288 Sasha Levin
2023-02-15 20:47 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2023-02-15 20:47 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 3/4] btrfs: send: limit number of clones and allocated memory size Sasha Levin
2023-02-15 20:47 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 4/4] IB/hfi1: Assign npages earlier Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230215204708.2761432-2-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox