From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
To: lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com,
ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com, kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com,
guennadi.liakhovetski@linux.intel.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
error27@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH for v6.3-rc] ASoC: SOF: ipc4-topology: Clarify bind failure caused by missing fw_module
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 12:09:09 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230403090909.18233-1-peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> (raw)
The original patch uses a feature in lib/vsprintf.c to handle the invalid
address when tring to print *_fw_module->man4_module_entry.name when the
*rc_fw_module is NULL.
This case is handled by check_pointer_msg() internally and turns the
invalid pointer to '(efault)' for printing but it is hiding useful
information about the circumstances. Change the print to emmit the name
of the widget and a note on which side's fw_module is missing.
Fixes: e3720f92e023 ("ASoC: SOF: avoid a NULL dereference with unsupported widgets")
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/alsa-devel/4826f662-42f0-4a82-ba32-8bf5f8a03256@kili.mountain/
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
---
Hi Mark, Dan,
This patch clarifies the print and will not rely on vsprintf internal protection
on printing the error.
Regards,
Peter
sound/soc/sof/ipc4-topology.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/ipc4-topology.c b/sound/soc/sof/ipc4-topology.c
index 669b99a4f76e..3a5394c3dd83 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sof/ipc4-topology.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sof/ipc4-topology.c
@@ -1806,10 +1806,12 @@ static int sof_ipc4_route_setup(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, struct snd_sof_route *
int ret;
if (!src_fw_module || !sink_fw_module) {
- /* The NULL module will print as "(efault)" */
- dev_err(sdev->dev, "source %s or sink %s widget weren't set up properly\n",
- src_fw_module->man4_module_entry.name,
- sink_fw_module->man4_module_entry.name);
+ dev_err(sdev->dev,
+ "cannot bind %s -> %s, no firmware module for: %s%s\n",
+ src_widget->widget->name, sink_widget->widget->name,
+ src_fw_module ? "" : " source",
+ sink_fw_module ? "" : " sink");
+
return -ENODEV;
}
--
2.40.0
next reply other threads:[~2023-04-03 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-03 9:09 Peter Ujfalusi [this message]
2023-04-03 9:11 ` [PATCH for v6.3-rc] ASoC: SOF: ipc4-topology: Clarify bind failure caused by missing fw_module kernel test robot
2023-04-03 9:13 ` Dan Carpenter
2023-04-03 12:51 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230403090909.18233-1-peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
--to=peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=guennadi.liakhovetski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox