FAILED: patch "[PATCH] cifs: protect session status check in smb2_reconnect()" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] cifs: protect session status check in smb2_reconnect()" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree

[gregkh]

The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-4.14.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 5bff9f741af60b143a5ae73417a8ec47fd5ff2f4
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023050757-sanding-emcee-489a@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 4.14.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:



thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 5bff9f741af60b143a5ae73417a8ec47fd5ff2f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 16:07:38 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] cifs: protect session status check in smb2_reconnect()

Use @ses->ses_lock to protect access of @ses->ses_status.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara (SUSE) <pc@manguebit.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>

diff --git a/fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c b/fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c
index 0521aa1da644..3ce63f0cd9f5 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c
@@ -175,8 +175,17 @@ smb2_reconnect(__le16 smb2_command, struct cifs_tcon *tcon,
 		}
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&tcon->tc_lock);
-	if ((!tcon->ses) || (tcon->ses->ses_status == SES_EXITING) ||
-	    (!tcon->ses->server) || !server)
+
+	ses = tcon->ses;
+	if (!ses)
+		return -EIO;
+	spin_lock(&ses->ses_lock);
+	if (ses->ses_status == SES_EXITING) {
+		spin_unlock(&ses->ses_lock);
+		return -EIO;
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&ses->ses_lock);
+	if (!ses->server || !server)
 		return -EIO;
 
 	spin_lock(&server->srv_lock);
@@ -204,8 +213,6 @@ again:
 	if (rc)
 		return rc;
 
-	ses = tcon->ses;
-
 	spin_lock(&ses->chan_lock);
 	if (!cifs_chan_needs_reconnect(ses, server) && !tcon->need_reconnect) {
 		spin_unlock(&ses->chan_lock);