From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Rai, Anjali" <anjali.rai@intel.com>
Cc: "regressions@lists.linux.dev" <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"Gandhi, Jinen" <jinen.gandhi@intel.com>,
"Qin, Kailun" <kailun.qin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Regression Issue
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 09:40:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023050851-trapper-preshow-2e4c@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM4PR11MB55183E4B87078E0F496386029A719@DM4PR11MB5518.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 07:33:58AM +0000, Rai, Anjali wrote:
> Hi
>
> We have one test which test the functionality of "using the same loopback address and port for both IPV6 and IPV4", The test should result in EADDRINUSE for binding IPv4 to same port, but it was successful
>
> Test Description:
> The test creates sockets for both IPv4 and IPv6, and forces IPV6 to listen for both IPV4 and IPV6 connections; this in turn makes binding another (IPV4) socket on the same port meaningless and results in -EADDRINUSE
>
> Our systems had Kernel v6.0.9 and the test was successfully executing, we recently upgraded our systems to v6.2, and we saw this as a failure. The systems which are not upgraded, there it is still passing.
>
> We don't exactly at which point this test broke, but our assumption is https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/28044fc1d4953b07acec0da4d2fc4784c57ea6fb
Is there a specific reason you did not add cc: for the authors of that
commit?
> Can you please check on your end whether this is an actual regression of a feature request.
If you revert that commit, does it resolve the issue? Have you worked
with the Intel networking developers to help debug this further?
thanks,
greg k-h
next parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-08 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <DM4PR11MB55183E4B87078E0F496386029A719@DM4PR11MB5518.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2023-05-08 7:40 ` Greg KH [this message]
2023-05-08 7:52 ` Regression Issue Rai, Anjali
2023-05-08 8:27 ` Rai, Anjali
2023-05-08 19:31 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-08 19:44 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-05-09 5:46 ` Rai, Anjali
2023-05-08 7:57 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2023050851-trapper-preshow-2e4c@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=anjali.rai@intel.com \
--cc=jinen.gandhi@intel.com \
--cc=kailun.qin@intel.com \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox