public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com, fancer.lancer@gmail.com, maz@kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] irqchip/mips-gic: Use raw spinlock for gic_lock" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree
Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 15:35:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023052850-dreadful-unthawed-efac@gregkh> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-4.19.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 3d6a0e4197c04599d75d85a608c8bb16a630a38c
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023052850-dreadful-unthawed-efac@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 4.19.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:

3d6a0e4197c0 ("irqchip/mips-gic: Use raw spinlock for gic_lock")
dd098a0e0319 ("irqchip/mips-gic: Get rid of the reliance on irq_cpu_online()")
6d4d367d0e9f ("irqchip/mips-gic: Use the correct local interrupt map registers")

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 3d6a0e4197c04599d75d85a608c8bb16a630a38c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 11:31:56 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] irqchip/mips-gic: Use raw spinlock for gic_lock

Since we may hold gic_lock in hardirq context, use raw spinlock
makes more sense given that it is for low-level interrupt handling
routine and the critical section is small.

Fixes BUG:

[    0.426106] =============================
[    0.426257] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
[    0.426422] 6.3.0-rc7-next-20230421-dirty #54 Not tainted
[    0.426638] -----------------------------
[    0.426766] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock:
[    0.426954] ffffffff8104e7b8 (gic_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: gic_set_type+0x30/08

Fixes: 95150ae8b330 ("irqchip: mips-gic: Implement irq_set_type callback")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
Reviewed-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230424103156.66753-3-jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c
index b568d55ef7c5..6d5ecc10a870 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ void __iomem *mips_gic_base;
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(unsigned long[GIC_MAX_LONGS], pcpu_masks);
 
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(gic_lock);
+static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(gic_lock);
 static struct irq_domain *gic_irq_domain;
 static int gic_shared_intrs;
 static unsigned int gic_cpu_pin;
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static int gic_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
 
 	irq = GIC_HWIRQ_TO_SHARED(d->hwirq);
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&gic_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gic_lock, flags);
 	switch (type & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK) {
 	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
 		pol = GIC_POL_FALLING_EDGE;
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static int gic_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
 	else
 		irq_set_chip_handler_name_locked(d, &gic_level_irq_controller,
 						 handle_level_irq, NULL);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gic_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gic_lock, flags);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *cpumask,
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	/* Assumption : cpumask refers to a single CPU */
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&gic_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gic_lock, flags);
 
 	/* Re-route this IRQ */
 	write_gic_map_vp(irq, BIT(mips_cm_vp_id(cpu)));
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *cpumask,
 		set_bit(irq, per_cpu_ptr(pcpu_masks, cpu));
 
 	irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu));
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gic_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gic_lock, flags);
 
 	return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK;
 }
@@ -357,12 +357,12 @@ static void gic_mask_local_irq_all_vpes(struct irq_data *d)
 	cd = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
 	cd->mask = false;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&gic_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gic_lock, flags);
 	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
 		write_gic_vl_other(mips_cm_vp_id(cpu));
 		write_gic_vo_rmask(BIT(intr));
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gic_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gic_lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void gic_unmask_local_irq_all_vpes(struct irq_data *d)
@@ -375,12 +375,12 @@ static void gic_unmask_local_irq_all_vpes(struct irq_data *d)
 	cd = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
 	cd->mask = true;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&gic_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gic_lock, flags);
 	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
 		write_gic_vl_other(mips_cm_vp_id(cpu));
 		write_gic_vo_smask(BIT(intr));
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gic_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gic_lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void gic_all_vpes_irq_cpu_online(void)
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ static void gic_all_vpes_irq_cpu_online(void)
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int i;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&gic_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gic_lock, flags);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(local_intrs); i++) {
 		unsigned int intr = local_intrs[i];
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ static void gic_all_vpes_irq_cpu_online(void)
 			write_gic_vl_smask(BIT(intr));
 	}
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gic_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gic_lock, flags);
 }
 
 static struct irq_chip gic_all_vpes_local_irq_controller = {
@@ -437,11 +437,11 @@ static int gic_shared_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
 
 	data = irq_get_irq_data(virq);
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&gic_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gic_lock, flags);
 	write_gic_map_pin(intr, GIC_MAP_PIN_MAP_TO_PIN | gic_cpu_pin);
 	write_gic_map_vp(intr, BIT(mips_cm_vp_id(cpu)));
 	irq_data_update_effective_affinity(data, cpumask_of(cpu));
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gic_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gic_lock, flags);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -533,12 +533,12 @@ static int gic_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
 	if (!gic_local_irq_is_routable(intr))
 		return -EPERM;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&gic_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gic_lock, flags);
 	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
 		write_gic_vl_other(mips_cm_vp_id(cpu));
 		write_gic_vo_map(mips_gic_vx_map_reg(intr), map);
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gic_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gic_lock, flags);
 
 	return 0;
 }


                 reply	other threads:[~2023-05-28 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2023052850-dreadful-unthawed-efac@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox