Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"open list:GENERIC ARCHITECTURE TOPOLOGY" 
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable 6.3 v2] arch_topology: Remove early cacheinfo error message if -ENOENT
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 10:26:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230531-anatomy-rectified-6ed3555c5f16@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230531085356.ru4fmtawyxo5cq5s@bogus>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2671 bytes --]

On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 09:53:56AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 03:42:45PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > Hi Conor,
> > 
> > On 5/30/23 14:39, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > Yo Florian,
> > > 
> > > On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 01:19:55PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > > > From: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
> > > > 
> > > > commit 3522340199cc060b70f0094e3039bdb43c3f6ee1 upstream
> > > > 
> > > > fetch_cache_info() tries to get the number of cache leaves/levels
> > > > for each CPU in order to pre-allocate memory for cacheinfo struct.
> > > > Allocating this memory later triggers a:
> > > >    'BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context'
> > > > in PREEMPT_RT kernels.
> > > > 
> > > > If there is no cache related information available in DT or ACPI,
> > > > fetch_cache_info() fails and an error message is printed:
> > > >    'Early cacheinfo failed, ret = ...'
> > > > 
> > > > Not having cache information should be a valid configuration.
> > > > Remove the error message if fetch_cache_info() fails with -ENOENT.
> > > > 
> > > > Suggested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230404-hatred-swimmer-6fecdf33b57a@spud/
> > > > Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230414081453.244787-4-pierre.gondois@arm.com
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
> > > 
> > > How come this now needs a backport? Did the rest of the series get
> > > backported, but not this one since it has no fixes tag?
> > 
> > Humm, indeed, this has been present in v6.3.2 since I requested it to be
> > included. The error that I saw this morning was not -ENOENT, but -EINVAL.
> > 
> > With those patches applied, no more -EINVAL:
> > 
> > cacheinfo: Allow early level detection when DT/ACPI info is missing/broken
> > cacheinfo: Add arm64 early level initializer implementation
> > cacheinfo: Add arch specific early level initializer
> > cacheinfo: Add use_arch[|_cache]_info field/function
> > 
> > I will submit those shortly unless we think they better not be in 6.3, in
> > which case it would be nice to silence those -EINVAL errors.
> 
> I prefer this option instead of back porting all the above 4 as there are
> some pending fixes for the issues found in those patches. I am fine if Greg
> is happy with the backport, so no strong rejection from my side :).

Just to be clear, I was not objecting, just curious!

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-31  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-30 20:19 [PATCH stable 6.3 v2] arch_topology: Remove early cacheinfo error message if -ENOENT Florian Fainelli
2023-05-30 21:39 ` Conor Dooley
2023-05-30 22:42   ` Florian Fainelli
2023-05-31  8:53     ` Sudeep Holla
2023-05-31  9:26       ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2023-05-31 15:28       ` Florian Fainelli
2023-05-31 15:43         ` Sudeep Holla
     [not found]           ` <0f2e3a2b-477b-cbd7-e756-4b3f4df8e045@broadcom.com>
2023-06-01  6:32             ` Sudeep Holla
2023-06-01 10:25               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-06-01 10:25 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230531-anatomy-rectified-6ed3555c5f16@spud \
    --to=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox