Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5.15.y] block: fix revalidate performance regression
Date: Tue,  6 Jun 2023 08:13:49 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230605231349.1326266-1-dlemoal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2023060549-smolder-human-a813@gregkh>

commit 47fe1c3064c6bc1bfa3c032ff78e603e5dd6e5bc upstream.

The scsi driver function sd_read_block_characteristics() always calls
blk_queue_set_zoned() to set a disk zoned model correctly, in case the
device model changed. This is done even for regular disks to set the
zoned model to BLK_ZONED_NONE and free any zone related resources if the
drive previously was zoned.

This behavior significantly impact the time it takes to revalidate disks
on a large system as the call to blk_queue_clear_zone_settings() done
from blk_queue_set_zoned() for the BLK_ZONED_NONE case results in the
device request queued to be frozen, even if there are no zone resources
to free.

Avoid this overhead for non-zoned devices by not calling
blk_queue_clear_zone_settings() in blk_queue_set_zoned() if the device
model was already set to BLK_ZONED_NONE, which is always the case for
regular devices.

Reported by: Brian Bunker <brian@purestorage.com>
Fixes: 508aebb80527 ("block: introduce blk_queue_clear_zone_settings()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230529073237.1339862-1-dlemoal@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
 block/blk-settings.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
index b880c70e22e4..73a80895e3ae 100644
--- a/block/blk-settings.c
+++ b/block/blk-settings.c
@@ -875,6 +875,7 @@ static bool disk_has_partitions(struct gendisk *disk)
 void blk_queue_set_zoned(struct gendisk *disk, enum blk_zoned_model model)
 {
 	struct request_queue *q = disk->queue;
+	unsigned int old_model = q->limits.zoned;
 
 	switch (model) {
 	case BLK_ZONED_HM:
@@ -912,7 +913,7 @@ void blk_queue_set_zoned(struct gendisk *disk, enum blk_zoned_model model)
 		 */
 		blk_queue_zone_write_granularity(q,
 						queue_logical_block_size(q));
-	} else {
+	} else if (old_model != BLK_ZONED_NONE) {
 		blk_queue_clear_zone_settings(q);
 	}
 }
-- 
2.40.1


  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-05 23:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-05 19:52 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] block: fix revalidate performance regression" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree gregkh
2023-06-05 23:13 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2023-06-07 18:29   ` [PATCH 5.15.y] block: fix revalidate performance regression Greg KH
2023-06-05 23:14 ` FAILED: patch "[PATCH] block: fix revalidate performance regression" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree Damien Le Moal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230605231349.1326266-1-dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox