* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: spin_lock_bh() to fix lockdep regression" failed to apply to 6.3-stable tree
@ 2023-06-19 6:54 gregkh
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2023-06-19 6:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hughd, johannes.berg; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 6.3-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.3.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x f1a0898b5d6a77d332d036da03bad6fa9770de5b
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023061905-bonelike-reorder-8961@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.3.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From f1a0898b5d6a77d332d036da03bad6fa9770de5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 14:29:39 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: spin_lock_bh() to fix lockdep regression
Lockdep on 6.4-rc on ThinkPad X1 Carbon 5th says
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
6.4.0-rc5 #1 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
kworker/3:1/49 [HC0[0]:SC0[4]:HE1:SE0] is trying to acquire:
ffff8881066fa368 (&mvm_sta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: rs_drv_get_rate+0x46/0xe7
and this task is already holding:
ffff8881066f80a8 (&sta->rate_ctrl_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: rate_control_get_rate+0xbd/0x126
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&sta->rate_ctrl_lock){+.-.}-{2:2} -> (&mvm_sta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock){+.+.}-{2:2}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&sta->rate_ctrl_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}
etc. etc. etc.
Changing the spin_lock() in rs_drv_get_rate() to spin_lock_bh() was not
enough to pacify lockdep, but changing them all on pers.lock has worked.
Fixes: a8938bc881d2 ("wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: Add locking to the rate read flow")
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/79ffcc22-9775-cb6d-3ffd-1a517c40beef@google.com
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c
index 23266d0c9ce4..9a20468345e4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c
@@ -2692,7 +2692,7 @@ static void rs_drv_get_rate(void *mvm_r, struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
lq_sta = mvm_sta;
- spin_lock(&lq_sta->pers.lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&lq_sta->pers.lock);
iwl_mvm_hwrate_to_tx_rate_v1(lq_sta->last_rate_n_flags,
info->band, &info->control.rates[0]);
info->control.rates[0].count = 1;
@@ -2707,7 +2707,7 @@ static void rs_drv_get_rate(void *mvm_r, struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
iwl_mvm_hwrate_to_tx_rate_v1(last_ucode_rate, info->band,
&txrc->reported_rate);
}
- spin_unlock(&lq_sta->pers.lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&lq_sta->pers.lock);
}
static void *rs_drv_alloc_sta(void *mvm_rate, struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
@@ -3264,11 +3264,11 @@ void iwl_mvm_rs_tx_status(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
/* If it's locked we are in middle of init flow
* just wait for next tx status to update the lq_sta data
*/
- if (!spin_trylock(&mvmsta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock))
+ if (!spin_trylock_bh(&mvmsta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock))
return;
__iwl_mvm_rs_tx_status(mvm, sta, tid, info, ndp);
- spin_unlock(&mvmsta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&mvmsta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_MAC80211_DEBUGFS
@@ -4117,9 +4117,9 @@ void iwl_mvm_rs_rate_init(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
} else {
struct iwl_mvm_sta *mvmsta = iwl_mvm_sta_from_mac80211(sta);
- spin_lock(&mvmsta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&mvmsta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock);
rs_drv_rate_init(mvm, sta, band);
- spin_unlock(&mvmsta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&mvmsta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock);
}
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: spin_lock_bh() to fix lockdep regression" failed to apply to 6.3-stable tree
@ 2023-06-26 14:19 gregkh
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2023-06-26 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hughd, johannes.berg; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 6.3-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.3.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x f1a0898b5d6a77d332d036da03bad6fa9770de5b
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023062625-squeamish-trident-4e6a@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.3.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From f1a0898b5d6a77d332d036da03bad6fa9770de5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 14:29:39 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: spin_lock_bh() to fix lockdep regression
Lockdep on 6.4-rc on ThinkPad X1 Carbon 5th says
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
6.4.0-rc5 #1 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
kworker/3:1/49 [HC0[0]:SC0[4]:HE1:SE0] is trying to acquire:
ffff8881066fa368 (&mvm_sta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: rs_drv_get_rate+0x46/0xe7
and this task is already holding:
ffff8881066f80a8 (&sta->rate_ctrl_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: rate_control_get_rate+0xbd/0x126
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&sta->rate_ctrl_lock){+.-.}-{2:2} -> (&mvm_sta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock){+.+.}-{2:2}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&sta->rate_ctrl_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}
etc. etc. etc.
Changing the spin_lock() in rs_drv_get_rate() to spin_lock_bh() was not
enough to pacify lockdep, but changing them all on pers.lock has worked.
Fixes: a8938bc881d2 ("wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: Add locking to the rate read flow")
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/79ffcc22-9775-cb6d-3ffd-1a517c40beef@google.com
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c
index 23266d0c9ce4..9a20468345e4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c
@@ -2692,7 +2692,7 @@ static void rs_drv_get_rate(void *mvm_r, struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
lq_sta = mvm_sta;
- spin_lock(&lq_sta->pers.lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&lq_sta->pers.lock);
iwl_mvm_hwrate_to_tx_rate_v1(lq_sta->last_rate_n_flags,
info->band, &info->control.rates[0]);
info->control.rates[0].count = 1;
@@ -2707,7 +2707,7 @@ static void rs_drv_get_rate(void *mvm_r, struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
iwl_mvm_hwrate_to_tx_rate_v1(last_ucode_rate, info->band,
&txrc->reported_rate);
}
- spin_unlock(&lq_sta->pers.lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&lq_sta->pers.lock);
}
static void *rs_drv_alloc_sta(void *mvm_rate, struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
@@ -3264,11 +3264,11 @@ void iwl_mvm_rs_tx_status(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
/* If it's locked we are in middle of init flow
* just wait for next tx status to update the lq_sta data
*/
- if (!spin_trylock(&mvmsta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock))
+ if (!spin_trylock_bh(&mvmsta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock))
return;
__iwl_mvm_rs_tx_status(mvm, sta, tid, info, ndp);
- spin_unlock(&mvmsta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&mvmsta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_MAC80211_DEBUGFS
@@ -4117,9 +4117,9 @@ void iwl_mvm_rs_rate_init(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
} else {
struct iwl_mvm_sta *mvmsta = iwl_mvm_sta_from_mac80211(sta);
- spin_lock(&mvmsta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&mvmsta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock);
rs_drv_rate_init(mvm, sta, band);
- spin_unlock(&mvmsta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&mvmsta->deflink.lq_sta.rs_drv.pers.lock);
}
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-06-26 14:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-06-26 14:19 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: spin_lock_bh() to fix lockdep regression" failed to apply to 6.3-stable tree gregkh
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-06-19 6:54 gregkh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).