From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19752EB64DA for ; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 09:47:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229617AbjGPJrM (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Jul 2023 05:47:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33824 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229449AbjGPJrL (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Jul 2023 05:47:11 -0400 Received: from out28-68.mail.aliyun.com (out28-68.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.28.68]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AA9410D0 for ; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 02:47:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=CONTINUE;BC=0.09814519|-1;CH=green;DM=|CONTINUE|false|;DS=CONTINUE|ham_enroll_verification|0.00302384-0.000234228-0.996742;FP=0|0|0|0|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=ay29a033018047187;MF=wangyugui@e16-tech.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=2;RT=2;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---.Tuy7ikg_1689500819; Received: from 192.168.2.112(mailfrom:wangyugui@e16-tech.com fp:SMTPD_---.Tuy7ikg_1689500819) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Sun, 16 Jul 2023 17:47:03 +0800 Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 17:47:03 +0800 From: Wang Yugui To: Greg KH Subject: Re: one 'BUG_ON(ret < 0);' is still left in queue-6.1/btrfs-do-not-bug_on-on-tree-mod-log-failure-at-balan.patch Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <2023071634-cogwheel-handgun-7cdb@gregkh> References: <20230715070222.55BF.409509F4@e16-tech.com> <2023071634-cogwheel-handgun-7cdb@gregkh> Message-Id: <20230716174658.DC0B.409509F4@e16-tech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.81.04 [en] Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi, > On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 07:02:27AM +0800, Wang Yugui wrote: > > Hi, > > > > one 'BUG_ON(ret < 0);' is still left in queue-6.1/btrfs-do-not-bug_on-on-tree-mod-log-failure-at-balan.patch > > > > so we need to rebase this patch. > > Great, can you send a new version for 5.15.y and 6.1.y? queue-5.15/btrfs-do-not-bug_on-on-tree-mod-log-failure-at-balan.patch is GOOD. queue-6.1/btrfs-do-not-bug_on-on-tree-mod-log-failure-at-balan.patch is GOOD. and we can 'git am' queue-5.15/btrfs-do-not-bug_on-on-tree-mod-log-failure-at-balan.patch to 6.1.38 cleanly. so it is OK to just copy queue-5.15/btrfs-do-not-bug_on-on-tree-mod-log-failure-at-balan.patch as queue-6.1/btrfs-do-not-bug_on-on-tree-mod-log-failure-at-balan.patch. Best Regards Wang Yugui (wangyugui@e16-tech.com) 2023/07/16