From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: hkallweit1@gmail.com, ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru,
martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com, thierry.reding@gmail.com,
u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] pwm: meson: modify and simplify calculation in" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 16:26:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023072118-blah-tripod-7878@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 6b9352f3f8a1a35faf0efc1ad1807ee303467796
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023072118-blah-tripod-7878@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
6b9352f3f8a1 ("pwm: meson: modify and simplify calculation in meson_pwm_get_state")
6c452cff79f8 ("pwm: Make .get_state() callback return an error code")
8eca6b0a647a ("Merge tag 'pwm/for-5.19-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/thierry.reding/linux-pwm")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 6b9352f3f8a1a35faf0efc1ad1807ee303467796 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 21:47:43 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] pwm: meson: modify and simplify calculation in
meson_pwm_get_state
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
I don't see a reason why we should treat the case lo < hi differently
and return 0 as period and duty_cycle. The current logic was added with
c375bcbaabdb ("pwm: meson: Read the full hardware state in
meson_pwm_get_state()"), Martin as original author doesn't remember why
it was implemented this way back then.
So let's handle it as normal use case and also remove the optimization
for lo == 0. I think the improved readability is worth it.
Fixes: c375bcbaabdb ("pwm: meson: Read the full hardware state in meson_pwm_get_state()")
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru>
Acked-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c
index 5732300eb004..3865538dd2d6 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c
@@ -351,18 +351,8 @@ static int meson_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
channel->lo = FIELD_GET(PWM_LOW_MASK, value);
channel->hi = FIELD_GET(PWM_HIGH_MASK, value);
- if (channel->lo == 0) {
- state->period = meson_pwm_cnt_to_ns(chip, pwm, channel->hi);
- state->duty_cycle = state->period;
- } else if (channel->lo >= channel->hi) {
- state->period = meson_pwm_cnt_to_ns(chip, pwm,
- channel->lo + channel->hi);
- state->duty_cycle = meson_pwm_cnt_to_ns(chip, pwm,
- channel->hi);
- } else {
- state->period = 0;
- state->duty_cycle = 0;
- }
+ state->period = meson_pwm_cnt_to_ns(chip, pwm, channel->lo + channel->hi);
+ state->duty_cycle = meson_pwm_cnt_to_ns(chip, pwm, channel->hi);
state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
reply other threads:[~2023-07-21 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2023072118-blah-tripod-7878@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox