stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	yhs@fb.com, mykolal@fb.com, luizcap@amazon.com,
	Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6.1.y 6/6] selftests/bpf: Fix sk_assign on s390x
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2023 03:45:14 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230722004514.767618-7-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230722004514.767618-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>

From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit 7ce878ca81bca7811e669db4c394b86780e0dbe4 ]

sk_assign is failing on an s390x machine running Debian "bookworm" for
2 reasons: legacy server_map definition and uninitialized addrlen in
recvfrom() call.

Fix by adding a new-style server_map definition and dropping addrlen
(recvfrom() allows NULL values for src_addr and addrlen).

Since the test should support tc built without libbpf, build the prog
twice: with the old-style definition and with the new-style definition,
then select the right one at runtime. This could be done at compile
time too, but this would not be cross-compilation friendly.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230129190501.1624747-2-iii@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_assign.c      | 25 ++++++++++++++-----
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_assign.c      | 11 ++++++++
 .../bpf/progs/test_sk_assign_libbpf.c         |  3 +++
 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_assign_libbpf.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_assign.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_assign.c
index 3e190ed63976..1374b626a985 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_assign.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_assign.c
@@ -29,7 +29,23 @@ static int stop, duration;
 static bool
 configure_stack(void)
 {
+	char tc_version[128];
 	char tc_cmd[BUFSIZ];
+	char *prog;
+	FILE *tc;
+
+	/* Check whether tc is built with libbpf. */
+	tc = popen("tc -V", "r");
+	if (CHECK_FAIL(!tc))
+		return false;
+	if (CHECK_FAIL(!fgets(tc_version, sizeof(tc_version), tc)))
+		return false;
+	if (strstr(tc_version, ", libbpf "))
+		prog = "test_sk_assign_libbpf.bpf.o";
+	else
+		prog = "test_sk_assign.bpf.o";
+	if (CHECK_FAIL(pclose(tc)))
+		return false;
 
 	/* Move to a new networking namespace */
 	if (CHECK_FAIL(unshare(CLONE_NEWNET)))
@@ -46,8 +62,8 @@ configure_stack(void)
 	/* Load qdisc, BPF program */
 	if (CHECK_FAIL(system("tc qdisc add dev lo clsact")))
 		return false;
-	sprintf(tc_cmd, "%s %s %s %s", "tc filter add dev lo ingress bpf",
-		       "direct-action object-file ./test_sk_assign.bpf.o",
+	sprintf(tc_cmd, "%s %s %s %s %s", "tc filter add dev lo ingress bpf",
+		       "direct-action object-file", prog,
 		       "section tc",
 		       (env.verbosity < VERBOSE_VERY) ? " 2>/dev/null" : "verbose");
 	if (CHECK(system(tc_cmd), "BPF load failed;",
@@ -129,15 +145,12 @@ get_port(int fd)
 static ssize_t
 rcv_msg(int srv_client, int type)
 {
-	struct sockaddr_storage ss;
 	char buf[BUFSIZ];
-	socklen_t slen;
 
 	if (type == SOCK_STREAM)
 		return read(srv_client, &buf, sizeof(buf));
 	else
-		return recvfrom(srv_client, &buf, sizeof(buf), 0,
-				(struct sockaddr *)&ss, &slen);
+		return recvfrom(srv_client, &buf, sizeof(buf), 0, NULL, NULL);
 }
 
 static int
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_assign.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_assign.c
index 98c6493d9b91..21b19b758c4e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_assign.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_assign.c
@@ -16,6 +16,16 @@
 #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
 #include <bpf/bpf_endian.h>
 
+#if defined(IPROUTE2_HAVE_LIBBPF)
+/* Use a new-style map definition. */
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP);
+	__type(key, int);
+	__type(value, __u64);
+	__uint(pinning, LIBBPF_PIN_BY_NAME);
+	__uint(max_entries, 1);
+} server_map SEC(".maps");
+#else
 /* Pin map under /sys/fs/bpf/tc/globals/<map name> */
 #define PIN_GLOBAL_NS 2
 
@@ -35,6 +45,7 @@ struct {
 	.max_elem = 1,
 	.pinning = PIN_GLOBAL_NS,
 };
+#endif
 
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_assign_libbpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_assign_libbpf.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..dcf46adfda04
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_assign_libbpf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#define IPROUTE2_HAVE_LIBBPF
+#include "test_sk_assign.c"
-- 
2.41.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-22  0:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-22  0:45 [PATCH 6.1.y 0/6] BPF selftests fixes for 6.1 branch Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-22  0:45 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 1/6] bpf: allow precision tracking for programs with subprogs Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-22  0:45 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 2/6] bpf: stop setting precise in current state Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-22  0:45 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 3/6] bpf: aggressively forget precise markings during state checkpointing Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-22  0:45 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 4/6] selftests/bpf: make test_align selftest more robust Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-22  0:45 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 5/6] selftests/bpf: Workaround verification failure for fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-22  0:45 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2023-07-23 20:33 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 0/6] BPF selftests fixes for 6.1 branch Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230722004514.767618-7-eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=luizcap@amazon.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).