From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
yhs@fb.com, mykolal@fb.com, luizcap@amazon.com,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6.1.y v2 0/6] BPF selftests fixes for 6.1 branch
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 15:42:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230724124223.1176479-1-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
Recently Luiz Capitulino reported BPF test failure for kernel version
6.1.36 (see [7]). The following test_verifier test failed:
"precise: ST insn causing spi > allocated_stack".
After back-port of the following upstream commit:
ecdf985d7615 ("bpf: track immediate values written to stack by BPF_ST instruction")
Investigation in [8] shows that test failure is not a bug, but a
difference in BPF verifier behavior between upstream, where commits
[1,2,3] by Andrii Nakryiko are present, and 6.1.36, where these
commits are absent. Both Luiz and Greg suggested back-porting [1,2,3]
from upstream to avoid divergences.
Commits [1,2,3] break test_progs selftest "align/packet variable offset",
commit [4] fixes this selftest.
I did some additional testing using the following compiler versions:
- Kernel compilation
- gcc version 11.3.0
- BPF tests compilation
- clang version 16.0.6
- clang version 17.0.0 (fa46feb31481)
And identified a few more failing BPF selftests:
- Tests failing with LLVM 16:
- test_verifier:
- precise: ST insn causing spi > allocated_stack FAIL (fixed by [1,2,3])
- test_progs:
- sk_assign (fixed by [6])
- Tests failing with LLVM 17:
- test_verifier:
- precise: ST insn causing spi > allocated_stack FAIL (fixed by [1,2,3])
- test_progs:
- fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify (fixed by [5])
- fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code (fixed by [5])
- sk_assign (fixed by [6])
Commits [4,5,6] only apply to BPF selftests and don't change verifier
behavior.
After applying all of the listed commits I have test_verifier,
test_progs, test_progs-no_alu32 and test_maps passing on my x86 setup,
both for LLVM 16 and LLVM 17.
Upstream commits in chronological order:
[1] be2ef8161572 ("bpf: allow precision tracking for programs with subprogs")
[2] f63181b6ae79 ("bpf: stop setting precise in current state")
[3] 7a830b53c17b ("bpf: aggressively forget precise markings during state checkpointing")
[4] 4f999b767769 ("selftests/bpf: make test_align selftest more robust")
[5] 63d78b7e8ca2 ("selftests/bpf: Workaround verification failure for fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code")
[6] 7ce878ca81bc ("selftests/bpf: Fix sk_assign on s390x")
Links:
[7] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/935c4751-d368-df29-33a6-9f4fcae720fa@amazon.com/
[8] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/c9b10a8a551edafdfec855fbd35757c6238ad258.camel@gmail.com/
Changelog:
V1 -> V2: added missing signed-off-by tags
V1: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20230722004514.767618-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/
Reported-by: Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@amazon.com>
Andrii Nakryiko (4):
bpf: allow precision tracking for programs with subprogs
bpf: stop setting precise in current state
bpf: aggressively forget precise markings during state checkpointing
selftests/bpf: make test_align selftest more robust
Ilya Leoshkevich (1):
selftests/bpf: Fix sk_assign on s390x
Yonghong Song (1):
selftests/bpf: Workaround verification failure for
fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 202 ++++++++++++++++--
.../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/align.c | 38 ++--
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_assign.c | 25 ++-
.../selftests/bpf/progs/connect4_prog.c | 2 +-
.../selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_assign.c | 11 +
.../bpf/progs/test_sk_assign_libbpf.c | 3 +
6 files changed, 247 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_assign_libbpf.c
--
2.41.0
next reply other threads:[~2023-07-24 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-24 12:42 Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2023-07-24 12:42 ` [PATCH 6.1.y v2 1/6] bpf: allow precision tracking for programs with subprogs Eduard Zingerman
2024-06-25 7:28 ` Shung-Hsi Yu
2024-07-02 8:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-07-24 12:42 ` [PATCH 6.1.y v2 2/6] bpf: stop setting precise in current state Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-24 12:42 ` [PATCH 6.1.y v2 3/6] bpf: aggressively forget precise markings during state checkpointing Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-24 12:42 ` [PATCH 6.1.y v2 4/6] selftests/bpf: make test_align selftest more robust Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-24 12:42 ` [PATCH 6.1.y v2 5/6] selftests/bpf: Workaround verification failure for fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-24 12:42 ` [PATCH 6.1.y v2 6/6] selftests/bpf: Fix sk_assign on s390x Eduard Zingerman
2023-07-25 10:22 ` [PATCH 6.1.y v2 0/6] BPF selftests fixes for 6.1 branch Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230724124223.1176479-1-eddyz87@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=luizcap@amazon.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox