From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACF0EB64DD for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 09:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230021AbjHAJQE (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2023 05:16:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42890 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232389AbjHAJPv (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2023 05:15:51 -0400 Received: from out198-152.us.a.mail.aliyun.com (out198-152.us.a.mail.aliyun.com [47.90.198.152]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75DDF19BD for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 02:13:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=CONTINUE;BC=0.1085581|-1;CH=green;DM=|CONTINUE|false|;DS=CONTINUE|ham_social|0.0758882-0.00203324-0.922078;FP=0|0|0|0|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=ay29a033018047204;MF=wangyugui@e16-tech.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=3;RT=3;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---.U5qNDLB_1690881145; Received: from 192.168.2.112(mailfrom:wangyugui@e16-tech.com fp:SMTPD_---.U5qNDLB_1690881145) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Tue, 01 Aug 2023 17:12:30 +0800 Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2023 17:12:31 +0800 From: Wang Yugui To: Greg KH Subject: Re: should stable 6.1.y include 6c21e066f925 mm/mempolicy: Take VMA lock before replacing policy? Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Jann Horn In-Reply-To: <2023080144-coasting-decathlon-74f1@gregkh> References: <20230801162059.899D.409509F4@e16-tech.com> <2023080144-coasting-decathlon-74f1@gregkh> Message-Id: <20230801171226.1330.409509F4@e16-tech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.81.04 [en] Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi, > On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 04:21:05PM +0800, Wang Yugui wrote: > > Hi, > > > > should stable 6.1.y include > > 6c21e066f925 mm/mempolicy: Take VMA lock before replacing policy > > ? > > Did you test it and see if it works? Why do you think it is needed in > 6.1.y when the "Fixes:" tag references a commit that is in 6.4 only? > Is the tag incorrect? Sorry that it should not be included in stable 6.1.y. I checked all mm-patches of 6.1.36-6.1.42 again. Best Regards Wang Yugui (wangyugui@e16-tech.com) 2023/08/01