From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + nilfs2-fix-warning-in-mark_buffer_dirty-due-to-discarded-buffer-reuse.patch added to mm-hotfixes-unstable branch
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 10:35:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230818173546.9D657C433C7@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The patch titled
Subject: nilfs2: fix WARNING in mark_buffer_dirty due to discarded buffer reuse
has been added to the -mm mm-hotfixes-unstable branch. Its filename is
nilfs2-fix-warning-in-mark_buffer_dirty-due-to-discarded-buffer-reuse.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/nilfs2-fix-warning-in-mark_buffer_dirty-due-to-discarded-buffer-reuse.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Subject: nilfs2: fix WARNING in mark_buffer_dirty due to discarded buffer reuse
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 22:18:04 +0900
A syzbot stress test using a corrupted disk image reported that
mark_buffer_dirty() called from __nilfs_mark_inode_dirty() or
nilfs_palloc_commit_alloc_entry() may output a kernel warning, and can
panic if the kernel is booted with panic_on_warn.
This is because nilfs2 keeps buffer pointers in local structures for some
metadata and reuses them, but such buffers may be forcibly discarded by
nilfs_clear_dirty_page() in some critical situations.
This issue is reported to appear after commit 28a65b49eb53 ("nilfs2: do
not write dirty data after degenerating to read-only"), but the issue has
potentially existed before.
Fix this issue by checking the uptodate flag when attempting to reuse an
internally held buffer, and reloading the metadata instead of reusing the
buffer if the flag was lost.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230818131804.7758-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+cdfcae656bac88ba0e2d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/0000000000003da75f05fdeffd12@google.com
Fixes: 8c26c4e2694a ("nilfs2: fix issue with flush kernel thread after remount in RO mode because of driver's internal error or metadata corruption")
Tested-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.10+
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
fs/nilfs2/alloc.c | 3 ++-
fs/nilfs2/inode.c | 7 +++++--
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/nilfs2/alloc.c~nilfs2-fix-warning-in-mark_buffer_dirty-due-to-discarded-buffer-reuse
+++ a/fs/nilfs2/alloc.c
@@ -205,7 +205,8 @@ static int nilfs_palloc_get_block(struct
int ret;
spin_lock(lock);
- if (prev->bh && blkoff == prev->blkoff) {
+ if (prev->bh && blkoff == prev->blkoff &&
+ likely(buffer_uptodate(prev->bh))) {
get_bh(prev->bh);
*bhp = prev->bh;
spin_unlock(lock);
--- a/fs/nilfs2/inode.c~nilfs2-fix-warning-in-mark_buffer_dirty-due-to-discarded-buffer-reuse
+++ a/fs/nilfs2/inode.c
@@ -1025,7 +1025,7 @@ int nilfs_load_inode_block(struct inode
int err;
spin_lock(&nilfs->ns_inode_lock);
- if (ii->i_bh == NULL) {
+ if (ii->i_bh == NULL || unlikely(!buffer_uptodate(ii->i_bh))) {
spin_unlock(&nilfs->ns_inode_lock);
err = nilfs_ifile_get_inode_block(ii->i_root->ifile,
inode->i_ino, pbh);
@@ -1034,7 +1034,10 @@ int nilfs_load_inode_block(struct inode
spin_lock(&nilfs->ns_inode_lock);
if (ii->i_bh == NULL)
ii->i_bh = *pbh;
- else {
+ else if (unlikely(!buffer_uptodate(ii->i_bh))) {
+ __brelse(ii->i_bh);
+ ii->i_bh = *pbh;
+ } else {
brelse(*pbh);
*pbh = ii->i_bh;
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com are
nilfs2-fix-general-protection-fault-in-nilfs_lookup_dirty_data_buffers.patch
nilfs2-fix-warning-in-mark_buffer_dirty-due-to-discarded-buffer-reuse.patch
reply other threads:[~2023-08-18 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230818173546.9D657C433C7@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox