From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: peterz@infradead.org, bp@alien8.de
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] x86/cpu/kvm: Provide UNTRAIN_RET_VM" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 18:16:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023082125-untainted-putdown-eba5@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 864bcaa38ee44ec6c0e43f79c2d2997b977e26b2
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2023082125-untainted-putdown-eba5@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
864bcaa38ee4 ("x86/cpu/kvm: Provide UNTRAIN_RET_VM")
d893832d0e1e ("x86/srso: Add IBPB on VMEXIT")
233d6f68b98d ("x86/srso: Add IBPB")
fb3bd914b3ec ("x86/srso: Add a Speculative RAS Overflow mitigation")
941d77c77339 ("Merge tag 'x86_cpu_for_v6.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 864bcaa38ee44ec6c0e43f79c2d2997b977e26b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 13:44:35 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] x86/cpu/kvm: Provide UNTRAIN_RET_VM
Similar to how it doesn't make sense to have UNTRAIN_RET have two
untrain calls, it also doesn't make sense for VMEXIT to have an extra
IBPB call.
This cures VMEXIT doing potentially unret+IBPB or double IBPB.
Also, the (SEV) VMEXIT case seems to have been overlooked.
Redefine the meaning of the synthetic IBPB flags to:
- ENTRY_IBPB -- issue IBPB on entry (was: entry + VMEXIT)
- IBPB_ON_VMEXIT -- issue IBPB on VMEXIT
And have 'retbleed=ibpb' set *BOTH* feature flags to ensure it retains
the previous behaviour and issues IBPB on entry+VMEXIT.
The new 'srso=ibpb_vmexit' option only sets IBPB_ON_VMEXIT.
Create UNTRAIN_RET_VM specifically for the VMEXIT case, and have that
check IBPB_ON_VMEXIT.
All this avoids having the VMEXIT case having to check both ENTRY_IBPB
and IBPB_ON_VMEXIT and simplifies the alternatives.
Fixes: fb3bd914b3ec ("x86/srso: Add a Speculative RAS Overflow mitigation")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230814121149.109557833@infradead.org
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
index 5285c8e93dff..c55cc243592e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
@@ -299,6 +299,17 @@
#endif
.endm
+.macro UNTRAIN_RET_VM
+#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_UNRET_ENTRY) || defined(CONFIG_CPU_IBPB_ENTRY) || \
+ defined(CONFIG_CALL_DEPTH_TRACKING) || defined(CONFIG_CPU_SRSO)
+ VALIDATE_UNRET_END
+ ALTERNATIVE_3 "", \
+ CALL_UNTRAIN_RET, X86_FEATURE_UNRET, \
+ "call entry_ibpb", X86_FEATURE_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT, \
+ __stringify(RESET_CALL_DEPTH), X86_FEATURE_CALL_DEPTH
+#endif
+.endm
+
.macro UNTRAIN_RET_FROM_CALL
#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_UNRET_ENTRY) || defined(CONFIG_CPU_IBPB_ENTRY) || \
defined(CONFIG_CALL_DEPTH_TRACKING)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
index 6f3e19527286..9026e3fe9f6c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
@@ -1054,6 +1054,7 @@ static void __init retbleed_select_mitigation(void)
case RETBLEED_MITIGATION_IBPB:
setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_ENTRY_IBPB);
+ setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT);
mitigate_smt = true;
break;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/vmenter.S b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/vmenter.S
index 265452fc9ebe..ef2ebabb059c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/vmenter.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/vmenter.S
@@ -222,10 +222,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__svm_vcpu_run)
* because interrupt handlers won't sanitize 'ret' if the return is
* from the kernel.
*/
- UNTRAIN_RET
-
- /* SRSO */
- ALTERNATIVE "", "call entry_ibpb", X86_FEATURE_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT
+ UNTRAIN_RET_VM
/*
* Clear all general purpose registers except RSP and RAX to prevent
@@ -362,7 +359,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__svm_sev_es_vcpu_run)
* because interrupt handlers won't sanitize RET if the return is
* from the kernel.
*/
- UNTRAIN_RET
+ UNTRAIN_RET_VM
/* "Pop" @spec_ctrl_intercepted. */
pop %_ASM_BX
reply other threads:[~2023-08-21 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2023082125-untainted-putdown-eba5@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox