public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Alexandra Diupina <adiupina@astralinux.ru>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PATCH 5.10] iommu/mediatek: remove redundant comparison
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 15:13:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023082458-mongrel-catlike-b73d@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230824130954.29688-1-adiupina@astralinux.ru>

On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 04:09:54PM +0300, Alexandra Diupina wrote:
> iommu_device_register always returns 0 in 4.11-5.12, so

What do you mean by "4.11-5.12"?

> we need to remove redundant comparison with 0

Why?

> 
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
> 
> Fixes: b16c0170b53c ("iommu/mediatek: Make use of iommu_device_register interface")

How is this a fix if it isn't actually changing the code at all?

> Signed-off-by: Alexandra Diupina <adiupina@astralinux.ru>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> index 051815c9d2bb..208c47218b75 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> @@ -748,9 +748,7 @@ static int mtk_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	iommu_device_set_ops(&data->iommu, &mtk_iommu_ops);
>  	iommu_device_set_fwnode(&data->iommu, &pdev->dev.of_node->fwnode);
>  
> -	ret = iommu_device_register(&data->iommu);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> +	iommu_device_register(&data->iommu);

This is obviously incorrect, please fix your "tool" that is telling you
to make such a broken change.

Unless your tool wants to create buggy code?  If so, it's succeeding
very well.

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-24 13:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-24 13:09 [PATCH] [PATCH 5.10] iommu/mediatek: remove redundant comparison Alexandra Diupina
2023-08-24 13:13 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2023-08-24 13:13 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-08-24 13:15 ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2023082458-mongrel-catlike-b73d@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=adiupina@astralinux.ru \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox